2003
DOI: 10.1214/ejp.v8-147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Theorems for Small Deviations of Random Series

Abstract: Let {ξ n } be a sequence of i.i.d. positive random variables with common distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gao et al (2003)) similar to the polynomial decay. In this paper however, we shall con…ne our attention to the case of the polynomial law for expositional simplicity and consistency of presentation, since the asymptotic behaviour of the small ball is not yet known in the general case for choices other than the polynomial decay as in D3.In practice, we would require some ordering for the marginal regressors in the static regressions case A1, since the in ‡uence of marginals is set to decrease via the bandwidth adjustments as discussed just above.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Gao et al (2003)) similar to the polynomial decay. In this paper however, we shall con…ne our attention to the case of the polynomial law for expositional simplicity and consistency of presentation, since the asymptotic behaviour of the small ball is not yet known in the general case for choices other than the polynomial decay as in D3.In practice, we would require some ordering for the marginal regressors in the static regressions case A1, since the in ‡uence of marginals is set to decrease via the bandwidth adjustments as discussed just above.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…(1,2) k the eigenvalues of the problems (3). Using the Li comparison theorem (see [12,14]) and Theorem 1, we obtain…”
Section: Proof Denote By µmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 2.2 (Lemma 5 in [3]). Suppose {c n } is a sequence of real numbers such that ∞ n=1 c n converges, and g has total variation D on [0, ∞).…”
Section: Proofs Of Theorem 21 and Theorem 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaussian random variables N (α, β 2 ); see Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.2. This is motivated by [3] in which the following exact level comparison theorems for small deviations were obtained: as r → 0, P { ∞ n=1 a n |ξ n | ≤ r} ∼ cP { ∞ n=1 b n |ξ n | ≤ r} for i.i.d. random variables {ξ n } whose common distribution satisfies several weak assumptions in the vicinity of zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%