40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting &Amp; Exhibit 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons Between DSMC and Navier-Stokes Solutions and Measurements in Regions of Laiviinar Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction in Hypersonic Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
32
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Again the recovery of the pressure and heat transfer towards the simple attached flow laminar values at the downstream end of the second cone was convincing evidence that the flows were not transitional or turbulent even after the separation. Figure 2 shows the pressure and heat transfer coefficient results produced by Moss [3] using DSMC for the hollow cylinder/flare body for test case 9 (see Table I). In this flow the weak-interaction bow shock coalesces with the shock generated by the separation (which occurs at about x/L = 0.4) to form a strengthened shock wave.…”
Section: Configurations Testedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again the recovery of the pressure and heat transfer towards the simple attached flow laminar values at the downstream end of the second cone was convincing evidence that the flows were not transitional or turbulent even after the separation. Figure 2 shows the pressure and heat transfer coefficient results produced by Moss [3] using DSMC for the hollow cylinder/flare body for test case 9 (see Table I). In this flow the weak-interaction bow shock coalesces with the shock generated by the separation (which occurs at about x/L = 0.4) to form a strengthened shock wave.…”
Section: Configurations Testedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests were conducted at Mach numbers in the range of 9.5 to 12.5 and for unit Reynolds numbers going from 1.19E+05/m to 1.46E+06/m. Full details of the model geometries and revised test conditions are given in Holden et al [3] and in an extensive database called CUBDAT [4]. Both configurations are axisymmetric and so avoid the experimental uncertainties that occur due to the finite span of the wind tunnel models with supposedly "two-dimensional" tests on, for example, flat plates and wedges.…”
Section: Configurations Testedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study of the flow in the LENS wind tunnel [7] shows that the flow is vibrational non-equilibrium and free-stream parameters have to be corrected. New parameters for Run 11 case is called here as Run 11c.…”
Section: Flow Conditions and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional investigation [7] of flow properties in the LENS wind tunnel revealed that the flow is vibrationally non-equilibrium under the conditions considered. As a result, the translational temperature and the velocity in the LENS test section are lower than the values reported previously.…”
Section: Run 11c Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation