1998
DOI: 10.1029/98jd02745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of airborne lidar measurements of ozone with airborne in situ measurements during the 1995 Southern Oxidants Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Errors in the ozone flux, production rate, and enhancement retrievals are influenced by a number of factors. The lidar ozone measurements at 90 m vertical and at 650 m horizontal resolution have a precision of about 3–10% and an accuracy of a few percent [ Alvarez et al , 1998, 2008]. For the retrievals described here, the ozone data were either integrated vertically and horizontally across the plume (ozone flux, production rate) or averaged vertically (ozone enhancement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Errors in the ozone flux, production rate, and enhancement retrievals are influenced by a number of factors. The lidar ozone measurements at 90 m vertical and at 650 m horizontal resolution have a precision of about 3–10% and an accuracy of a few percent [ Alvarez et al , 1998, 2008]. For the retrievals described here, the ozone data were either integrated vertically and horizontally across the plume (ozone flux, production rate) or averaged vertically (ozone enhancement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ozone measurements in the Houston and Dallas/Fort Worth plumes were obtained with two different versions of the NOAA airborne ozone and aerosol lidar. The TexAQS 2000 ozone data were collected with an excimer laser‐based airborne ozone lidar that used five fixed wavelengths in the UV spectral region to detect ozone [ Alvarez et al , 1998]. The TexAQS 2000 missions were flown on a Douglas DC‐3 aircraft.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[83] The NOAA airborne ozone/aerosol differential absorption lidar (DIAL) [Alvarez et al, 1998] was deployed on a chartered DC-3 aircraft, also stationed at the Pease Tradeport. The nadir-looking lidar measured ozone profiles in the boundary layer with high spatial resolution (90 m vertical, 600 m horizontal) with a precision that varied between 5 and 15 ppbv, depending on the total atmospheric extinction.…”
Section: Appendix A: Mobile Platform Instrument Payloads and Deploymementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertical cross section of logarithmic derivative of the range‐corrected aerosol backscatter d ( lnPz 2 )/ dz from the airborne ozone lidar flown during Nashville‐95 [ Alvarez et al , 1998]. The flight leg depicted here crossed Nashville from northwest to southeast on 12 July 1995 (Julian Day 193), as described in B98.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Southern Oxidants Study 1995 Nashville intensive field‐measurement campaign during June and July 1995 (SOS‐95) was designed to study ozone formation in a modest‐sized, isolated city in the southeastern United States. The study, described by Cowling et al [1998] and Meagher et al [1998], included extensive surface‐based chemistry and meteorological measurements along with airborne measurements by several different types of instrumented aircraft [ Hübler et al , 1998; Alvarez et al , 1998].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%