ASME 2005 Internal Combustion Engine Division Spring Technical Conference 2005
DOI: 10.1115/ices2005-1010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of Combustion Simulations Using a Representative Interactive Flamelet Model and Direct Integration of CFD With Detailed Chemistry

Abstract: Diesel engine simulation results using two different combustion models are presented in this study, namely the Representative Interactive Flamelet (RIF) model and the direct integration of CFD and CHEMKIN. Both models have been implemented into an improved version of the KIVA code. The KIVA/RIF model uses a single flamelet approach and also considers the effects of vaporization on turbulence-chemistry interactions. The KIVA/CHEMKIN model uses a direct integration approach that solves for the chemical reactions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cylindrical mesh is finer near the injector for fuel spray simulations. The present mesh resolution is considered to be adequate for engine modelling and has been used in RANS simulations in previous studies [20,30]. A mesh sensitivity study of using the present LES model also shows that the predicted global properties, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The cylindrical mesh is finer near the injector for fuel spray simulations. The present mesh resolution is considered to be adequate for engine modelling and has been used in RANS simulations in previous studies [20,30]. A mesh sensitivity study of using the present LES model also shows that the predicted global properties, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The Arrhenius formulation based on a detailed mechanism is often called a Chemkin approach because the mechanism typically follows the Chemkin input format and is solved by the Chemkin solution procedure. This approach has been used to predict homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) combustion (Kong et al, 2005;Li and Kong, 2008). The Chemkin approach is predictive over the entire phase of HCCI combustion (Kong et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another term that requires a closure model is the mean burning rate, Other closure models for turbulent combustion are also developed, such as eddy dissipation model [7], RIF model [8], Shell model [9], and characteristic time scale model [9].…”
Section: Combustion Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%