2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of extensive green roof media in Southern Ontario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, grasses performed better than forbs or sedum. In Hill et al [49], soil from 33 green roofs in the Southern Ontario region were sampled and analysed in a lab. In De-Ville et al [50], the physical properties of 12 green roof substrate cores (some virgin, some 5 years old from green roof test beds) are evaluated using XMT imaging.…”
Section: Hydrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, grasses performed better than forbs or sedum. In Hill et al [49], soil from 33 green roofs in the Southern Ontario region were sampled and analysed in a lab. In De-Ville et al [50], the physical properties of 12 green roof substrate cores (some virgin, some 5 years old from green roof test beds) are evaluated using XMT imaging.…”
Section: Hydrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These materials came from a dry alluvial quarry located in the Paleodelta of the Durance River, in the plain of La Crau (Bouches-du-Rhône, France) 60 km south of the experimental site. Because using inorganic substrate alone may limit plant growth, organic matter was added [28,42,43]. This organic amendment (NF U 44-051) was in the form of green compost with 52% dry matter, 22% organic matter, 0.75% total nitrogen and potassium oxide for up to 0.5% of the mass of the crude product.…”
Section: Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…European and international recommendations for green roof supports involve substrates based on granular mineral materials or lightweight aggregates, such as volcanic pumice (pozzolana), expanded slate, sand, crushed brick or concrete [26,27]. In other cases, composted materials are commonly used as substrate [28,29]. The ideal substrate results in a freely draining combination of coarse aggregates, with more or less organic content [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mineral-based examples include lightweight expanded shale or clay, crushed brick, and other recycled construction materials; biologically derived examples include chipped bark, wood mulch, and composted wood products. In the European market, mixtures usually contain a small fraction of biological material, in concordance with the guidelines of Forschungsgesellschaft Landschaftsentwicklung-Landschaftsbau (2008), whereas in some North American regions, soilless mixtures containing a much higher proportion of organic matter (OM) are being used (Hill et al, 2016). The organic content is frequently needed to provide nutrients to support plant growth, and the biological material is typically lighter weight (Sandoval et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%