2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2018.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of mandatory and discretionary lane changing behavior on freeways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Talebpour et al constructed a lane-changing simulation framework, which was verified by NGSIM data to have higher accuracy than the basic gap acceptance model [22]. By using NGSIM data, Woo et al and Vechione et al evaluated the performance of a dynamic potential energy model on lane-changing behavior prediction and the effects of decision variables on discretionary lane-changing as well as mandatory lanechanging, respectively [23,24].…”
Section: Lane-changing Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Talebpour et al constructed a lane-changing simulation framework, which was verified by NGSIM data to have higher accuracy than the basic gap acceptance model [22]. By using NGSIM data, Woo et al and Vechione et al evaluated the performance of a dynamic potential energy model on lane-changing behavior prediction and the effects of decision variables on discretionary lane-changing as well as mandatory lanechanging, respectively [23,24].…”
Section: Lane-changing Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu and Sun [78] proposed an algorithm for multilane freeway merging by optimizing lane change and car-following trajectories in the connected environment. Vechione et al [79] compared a mandatory and discretionary lane-change behaviour on freeways using NGSIM database and model in AIMSUN microscopic software. The results suggested that the authors should develop MLC and DLC separately when modelling the lane-change behaviour.…”
Section: Models Based On Search Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input parameters (speed, acceleration/ deceleration) must be set to model driver behaviour. Game theory Kita (1999) [70] The drivers maximize their respective payoffs to achieve better outcomes under specific strategies of opponents Hu and Sun (2019) [77] Vechione et al (2018) [79] angle between the pedestrian's desired path and the selected path; and β the angle between the desired path and the area occupied by the pedestrian. The sum of the forces from journey destinations, obstacles and other pedestrians affects the observed pedestrians in the network and determines their speed of movement over a period of time.…”
Section: Psychophysicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… A is the driving strategy set of the vehicle and U is the corresponding set of payment functions. 13 For SV with lane-change intentions, the strategy set has two possibilities—CL and not changing lane (NCL)—which can be expressed as A SV = { CL , NCL } . 15 For VRT, the most affected one, the coping strategies are divided into four types: keeping the original lane and car-following behavior (Kee), decelerating (Dec), accelerating (Acc), and CL.…”
Section: Lane-change Decision Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A forced lane change usually occurs when the subject driver is trying to move his or her vehicle from its existing lane into the target lane in anticipation of the next left or right turn, or lane closure immediately downstream. 13 On the highway, the slow traffic participants in front are usually also vehicles. An example is the typical two-lane, five-vehicle scene shown in Figure 1 The SV is blocked by the VFS, and the SV is changed from Lane 2 to Lane 1 to increase its own speed.…”
Section: Lane-change Decision Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%