2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of microbial abundance and community among different plant species in constructed wetlands in summer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the results indicated that Proteobacteria was the dominant phyla followed by Bacteroidetes in the three systems. This finding was consistent with a plenty of studies that reported Proteobacteria as the dominant phylum in various microorganism samples from the substrate or rhizosphere in wetlands 22 38 40 41 . Proteobacteria , which displayed a remarkably high level of bacterial metabolic diversity involved in global carbon, nitrogen and sulfur cycling, played an important role in pollutants removal 40 42 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Firstly, the results indicated that Proteobacteria was the dominant phyla followed by Bacteroidetes in the three systems. This finding was consistent with a plenty of studies that reported Proteobacteria as the dominant phylum in various microorganism samples from the substrate or rhizosphere in wetlands 22 38 40 41 . Proteobacteria , which displayed a remarkably high level of bacterial metabolic diversity involved in global carbon, nitrogen and sulfur cycling, played an important role in pollutants removal 40 42 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Proteobacteria has been widely considered an active participant in nitrogen removal in the CWs for its high diversity of metabolism which involves global carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling [62]. The results of this study were consistent with several previous studies that indicated Proteobacteria as the dominant bacterial community in a variety of wetland substrates [48,49,62,63]. Further comparison of Proteobacteria by order also indicated a difference in the relative abundances of many orders, such as Burkholderiales, Oceanospirillales, Pseudomonadales, and Rhodocyclales, between samples from the substrate of planted systems and those from the unplanted ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results suggested that plant type might influence bacterial abundance in the FWSF-CW. The potential influence of plant type on bacterial abundance has also been reported in natural wetlands (Lee and Kang 2016) and CWs treating industrial wastewater (Calheiros et al 2010) or synthetic wastewater (Zhang et al 2015b;Liu et al 2016). In addition, Long et al (2016a) also suggested that plant type might be a key determinant to bacterial abundance in a VF-CW used for river water treatment.…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Variations Of Wetland Bacterial Abundancementioning
confidence: 84%
“…These results further suggested the potential influence of vegetation type on bacterial richness and diversity in the FWSF-CW. Several previous studies also suggested important roles of vegetation type in determining bacterial richness and diversity in natural wetlands (Yu et al 2012;Lee et al 2015;Lee and Kang 2016), and CWs treating industrial wastewater (Calheiros et al 2010) or synthetic wastewater (Liu et al 2016;Zhang et al 2015b), and a VF-CW used for river water treatment (Long et al 2016a). There has been no report Fig.…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Variations Of Wetland Bacterial Richnesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation