2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compatibility between response position and either object typical size or semantic category: SNARC- and MARC-like effects in primary school children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probe pictures remained visible until participants responded. The relative position of the two pictures (left vs. right) was counterbalanced 41 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probe pictures remained visible until participants responded. The relative position of the two pictures (left vs. right) was counterbalanced 41 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two probe pictures remained visible until participants responded. The relative position of the two pictures (left vs. right) was counterbalanced (Uccula et al, 2020b ). The 60 experimental trials were preceded by 10 practice trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, associations involving either verbal-spatial or visuospatial coding mechanisms can serve to induce SNARC effects. However, most existing research utilizes tasks that involve lateralized visuospatial responding ( Cipora et al, 2019 ; Pellegrino et al, 2019 ; Uccula et al, 2020 ) with only a small few utilizing verbal-spatial responding to explore this effect. Namely, classic SNARC experiments typically map responses to the left and right hands, and only in the balance of the experimental design is each number mapped to the two hands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%