2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compatibility measures and consensus models for group decision making with intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So we can realize the target of evaluating each HME via the distance measure and the effect of it. And the effect is similar to the compatibility degree between a pair of intuitionistic multiplicative values presented by Jiang et al [46]. We concisely represent the distance measure presented by Xu and Xia [47], called hesitant normalized Hamming distance.…”
Section: Distance Measure For Hmesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…So we can realize the target of evaluating each HME via the distance measure and the effect of it. And the effect is similar to the compatibility degree between a pair of intuitionistic multiplicative values presented by Jiang et al [46]. We concisely represent the distance measure presented by Xu and Xia [47], called hesitant normalized Hamming distance.…”
Section: Distance Measure For Hmesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, by Equation (30), we derive that the elements that cost these highest deviation are f 14 and f 41 from F 1 . We replace them according to Equation (32), to obtain the first around adjusted outranking flow matrix F …”
Section: A Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We even cannot live without it in such a high complex society. Due to the changing and complicated socioeconomic environment, group decision making (GDM) has become a prevalent topic in the last decades (Conde and Pérez 2010;Fang et al 2012;Jiang et al 2013Jiang et al , 2015aJiang et al , b, 2016Li et al 2017;Liang et al 2017;Liu 2009;Orlovsky 1978;Pinar et al 2017;Qin 2017;Ren et al 2017;Sanchez et al 2017;Xia et al 2013;Xu 2007Xu , 2010Xu and Chen 2008;Yu 2015a, b;Yu and Shi 2015). In GDM, it is not necessary that a single decision maker should consider all important aspects of practical decision-making problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, the gap between the grades expressing good information should be larger than the one between the grades reflecting bad information. One example is the law of diminishing marginal utility in economics (Jiang et al 2013;Xia et al 2013). It is stated that as the amount of one factor of production increases as all other factors of production hold the same, the marginal return (extra output gained by adding an extra unit) decreases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%