2020
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2019.2960114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compensation of Communication Delays in a Cooperative ACC System

Abstract: DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In case (b) a new time delay for each vehicle is drawn from a uniform distribution for each simulation run. The upper limit of the random time delay is set to 1 s, which is well above the time delays typically considered in the literature [33][34][35] and therefore covers all relevant scenarios. Case (c) is a hypothetical situation in which the controller should not be operated in general and it could not be called CACC any more, because there is no cooperation between the platoon members.…”
Section: Optimisation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case (b) a new time delay for each vehicle is drawn from a uniform distribution for each simulation run. The upper limit of the random time delay is set to 1 s, which is well above the time delays typically considered in the literature [33][34][35] and therefore covers all relevant scenarios. Case (c) is a hypothetical situation in which the controller should not be operated in general and it could not be called CACC any more, because there is no cooperation between the platoon members.…”
Section: Optimisation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the proposed Eco-ACC is model-free and real-time, and can be robust in different car-following scenarios. With the rapid development of vehicle-to-vehicle communication technology, the cooperative ACC has attracted a lot of researchers due to its better control performance than the ACC [31]- [33]. In the future, the ADHDP-based method will be used to develop a novel CACC strategy for connected and automated vehicles to further improve the control performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], the authors take into account the characteristics of wireless communication links, such as the sampling delays, and present a network-aware CACC approach. In other works [15]- [24], researchers have designed a variety of ACC/CACC control solutions by combining different mechanisms, such as multi-modeling [15], driving style recognition [16], direct yaw moment control [17], acceleration/control feedforward [18], linear quadratic regulator (LQR) [19], and information-delay compensation mechanisms [20]- [24]. Additionally, some researchers incorporate parametric uncertainties into the vehicle dynamics and aim to design robust linear feedback controllers for vehicle platooning by leveraging the classical Kharitonov theorem and the Hurwitz criterion [28].…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%