2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compensatory mechanisms of transtibial amputees during circular turning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the hip joints in ILEA with RSPs have a shock-absorbing function rather than a spring-like function. In fact, some previous studies demonstrated this unique compensatory strategy involving the hip joint during walking in transtibial amputees (Grumillier et al, 2008; Ventura et al, 2011). Further, Galli et al (2008) demonstrated that a similar distinct impact of hip extension moment at early stance phase during walking was observed in subjects with Down syndrome, but not in a control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These results suggest that the hip joints in ILEA with RSPs have a shock-absorbing function rather than a spring-like function. In fact, some previous studies demonstrated this unique compensatory strategy involving the hip joint during walking in transtibial amputees (Grumillier et al, 2008; Ventura et al, 2011). Further, Galli et al (2008) demonstrated that a similar distinct impact of hip extension moment at early stance phase during walking was observed in subjects with Down syndrome, but not in a control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…41 Study interventions were designed to strategically address specific body function impairments common in people with lower-limb amputation that contribute to activity limitations: decreased hip extension range of motion, 42 gluteal weakness, 14 balance impairment, 29 and functional prosthetic turning deficits. 43,44 The sequence of specific interventions was guided by the spinal stability model proposed by Panjabi, 45 popularized by Lee,46 and expanded to include movement by Hoffman. 47 Briefly summarized, when passive joint structures either (a) insufficiently stabilize or (b) excessively restrict normal movement, active muscular structures deviate from the normal pelvic stability and hip mobility functions-observed as weakness and dysfunctional movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies of four representative daily activities show that turning steps may account for an average of 25 percent of steps, ranging from 8 to 50 percent of all steps depending on the activity [12], which people with amputation accomplish using different control strategies than nondisabled people. While a nondisabled person relies on hip movement in the coronal plane and moments generated at the ankle, a person with amputation using a passive prosthesis relies on hip extension in the sagittal plane [13][14][15][16]. During a turn, modulation of ankle impedance in the sagittal and frontal planes plays a major role in controlling lateral and propulsive ground reaction forces in order to accelerate the body's center of mass along the gait path; thus, during a turning step, lateral and propulsive impulses are larger than during a straight step [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During a turn, modulation of ankle impedance in the sagittal and frontal planes plays a major role in controlling lateral and propulsive ground reaction forces in order to accelerate the body's center of mass along the gait path; thus, during a turning step, lateral and propulsive impulses are larger than during a straight step [17]. This difference will result in different gait strategies between people with amputation and nondisabled people to compensate for the lack of propulsion from a passive prosthesis in order to increase maneuverability [13]. This suggests that an ankle-foot prosthesis capable of generating moments in two DOFs, i.e., dorsiflexion-plantar flexion (DP) and inversion-eversion (IE) directions, with impedance modulation similar to the human ankle will augment maneuverability and mobility that leads to a more agile gait.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%