2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63589-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competing effects of soil fertility and toxicity on tropical greening

Abstract: Tropical forests are expected to green up with increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentrations, but primary productivity may be limited by soil nutrient availability. However, rarely have canopy-scale measurements been assessed against soil measurements in the tropics. Here, we sought to assess remotely sensed canopy greenness against steep soil nutrient gradients across 50 1-ha mature forest plots in Panama. Contrary to expectations, increases in in situ extractable soil phosphorus (P) and base cations (K, Mg) cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a general ecosystem function, GPP, is likely to be an emergent property resulting from the interactions of several elements. GPP depends on the water and light availability [27], further on other resources and environmental conditions, such as solar radiation [28], nutrient availability [29], soil toxicity [30], temperature [31], and topography [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a general ecosystem function, GPP, is likely to be an emergent property resulting from the interactions of several elements. GPP depends on the water and light availability [27], further on other resources and environmental conditions, such as solar radiation [28], nutrient availability [29], soil toxicity [30], temperature [31], and topography [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger effects of multiple nutrient additions (N, P, calcium, or Ca) on forest productivity than a single element was, revealed in a recent study of nutrient availability in northeastern US hardwood forests [27]. Additionally, a strong relationship between satellite-derived canopy greenness and soil N, aluminum (Al), and P was observed in tropical forests [52]. Moreover, many modeling experiments considered soil as a mixed column and thus relationships between soil nutrients and vegetation growth cannot be inferred for soil depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nutrient aboveground–belowground coordination, a recent global review indicated greater coordination of leaf with root N : P ratios in tropical forests relative to most other biomes, likely related to widespread tropical soil P scarcity and conservation of P in plant tissues (Wang et al ., 2022). A broad‐scale paper linking remotely sense canopy traits in Panama with soil data found that canopy greenness (a surrogate for NPP) corresponded to variations in soil fertility and toxicity (Fisher et al ., 2020). Also, AMF vs ECM association has been linked to canopy reflectance properties in tropical forests in Hawai'i (as well as in many temperate sites), likely also indicating aboveground–belowground plant nutrition linkages (Sousa et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highlighting the difficulty of using morphological root traits to infer function, fine‐root traits (diameter, SRL, root tissue density, and branching) for 1467 Amazonian tree species had no significant association with landscape‐scale shifts in bulk soil fertility (Vleminckx et al ., 2021). This is in contrast to some aboveground tropical forest traits, like canopy greenness and nutrient content, which often covary with soil fertility and soil texture (Fyllas et al ., 2012; Fortunel et al ., 2014; Fisher et al ., 2020). Root diameter, which is functionally most closely related to water conductivity, has been used as a proxy for AMF colonization rate, even though this relationship has not been consistently demonstrated for tropical forests (Kong et al ., 2014; Lugli et al ., 2020; Yaffar et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%