2008
DOI: 10.5194/bg-5-1-2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competing roles of rising CO<sub>2</sub> and climate change in the contemporary European carbon balance

Abstract: Abstract. Natural ecosystems respond to, and may affect climate change through uptake and storage of atmospheric CO 2 . Here we use the land-surface and carbon cycle model JULES to simulate the contemporary European carbon balance and its sensitivity to rising CO 2 and changes in climate. We find that the impact of climate change is to decrease the ability of Europe to store carbon by 97 TgC yr −1 . In contrast, the effect of rising atmospheric CO 2 has been to stimulate increased uptake and storage. The CO 2 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding and quantifying biogeochemical feedbacks that may modify the CO 2 -fertilisation effect in terrestrial ecosystems are key steps in understanding and predicting the future sink strength of the biosphere and thus atmospheric CO 2 concentration (Thompson et al 2004;Harrison et al 2008) and in assessing the impact of global change on managed (e.g. Kimball et al 2002) and natural ecosystems (Nowak et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding and quantifying biogeochemical feedbacks that may modify the CO 2 -fertilisation effect in terrestrial ecosystems are key steps in understanding and predicting the future sink strength of the biosphere and thus atmospheric CO 2 concentration (Thompson et al 2004;Harrison et al 2008) and in assessing the impact of global change on managed (e.g. Kimball et al 2002) and natural ecosystems (Nowak et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They do not account, however, for changes in environmental factors, and they only simulate aboveground biomass and need to be complemented by soil models, soil data and/or biomass expansion factors (BEF) to produce complete carbon budgets. • Process models such as ORCHIDEE, JULES, LPJ, BIOME-BGC or EuroBiota (Milne & Van Oijen, 2005;Zaehle et al, 2006Zaehle et al, , 2007Harrison et al, 2008;Luyssaert et al, 2010) rely on a set of equations describing eco-physiological processes such as photosynthesis, respiration and transpiration. As opposed to empirical models, process models are arguably more realistic for long simulations during which climate and [CO 2 ] change, because they explicitly account for the complex effect of these forcing variables on ecosystems, and their interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating C stocks and changes, especially at finer spatial scales, requires the use of refined estimates of D b , which can be obtained using the types of landscape-scale models described in this paper. It is at these scales that many spatially distributed land-atmosphere interaction models such as JULES operate (Harrison et al, 2008).…”
Section: Stock Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dawson and Smith (2007) suggest that much of the error associated with carbon stock inventory in soils can be traced back to uncertainties in D b estimates, prompting further investigation into the methods for deriving these estimates. Furthermore, soil carbon content plays a crucial role in spatially distributed, integrated land-atmosphere process models such as JULES (Harrison et al, 2008). There is evidence that improvements to the soil C component in these types of models increases their response sensitivity to changes in soil stocks and processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%