1969
DOI: 10.2307/1934659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition in the Semidesert Grass‐shrub Type as Influneced by Root Systems, Growth Habits, and Soil Moisture Extraction

Abstract: Measurements of phenological development, herbage production, basal area, and density of annual and perennial grasses and of the half—shrub burroweed (Aplopappus tenuisectus (Greene) Blake), over a 4—year period show that production of each class of plant was affected to some extent by each of the others, except that annual grasses had no effect on burroweed crown area. Production of Arizona cottontop (Trichachne californica (Benth.) Chase), the dominant perennial grass, was restricted about 25% on plots with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found significant numbers of both coarse and fine roots up to 2 m beneath dune surface and to at least 1 m depth in soils between dunes. Jenkins et al (1988) identified mesquite roots in Jornada dunes at depths of up to 6 m. In comparison, desert grasses generally concentrate roots in the upper 15 cm of soil (Cable 1969). We found only fine root biomass in our grassland profiles, most of which was concentrated between 0 and 40 cm depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found significant numbers of both coarse and fine roots up to 2 m beneath dune surface and to at least 1 m depth in soils between dunes. Jenkins et al (1988) identified mesquite roots in Jornada dunes at depths of up to 6 m. In comparison, desert grasses generally concentrate roots in the upper 15 cm of soil (Cable 1969). We found only fine root biomass in our grassland profiles, most of which was concentrated between 0 and 40 cm depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…These transformations, in turn, may alter the composition and turnover of constituent SOM pools. An increase in mesquite dominance has been shown to alter belowground production, from fine root biomass distributed in surface horizons to deeper coarse root biomass concentrated beneath shrub canopies (Cable 1969;Heitschmidt et al 1988;Brown and Archer 1990). While total root weight increases in soils beneath mesquite, relative to grasses (McPherson et al 1993), the proportion of fine root biomass (<2 mm) apparently declines (Virginia et al 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water at depth is recharged on some grasslands largely by rainfall during the dormant season of grasses (e.g., Cable 1969). In these ecosystems, changes in grass transpiration probably will not greatly affect growth of deeply-rooting shrubs.…”
Section: Potential Consequences Of Lower Evapotranspiration To the Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depth of the soil profile above a water-and root-restrictive layer (e.g., bedrock, caliche, claypan) defines the volume of soil in which water can be held and from which roots can extract retained water (Cable 1969). However, fractures in the restrictive layer can allow water penetration to greater depths and provide plant roots with access to deep soil moisture (Noy-Meir 1973).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%