2014
DOI: 10.1177/0192512114535450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive authoritarianism and popular protest: Evidence from Serbia under Milošević

Abstract: This article explores the relationship between competitive authoritarianism and popular protest. Building upon comparative regime analysis and social movement research, it argues that this hybrid regime type facilitates popular protest by providing opposition forces with considerable institutional resources to organize themselves and confront regime elites, along with grievances that provide strong incentives for popular challenges. In turn, popular protest may trigger regime crisis and extract important conce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Milošević used nationalism instrumentally to gain public support at the time of federal and multinational Yugoslavia’s bloody collapse and suppressed opposition parties and civil society. Large waves of popular mobilization broke out against the regime in 1991, 1992, 1996–1997, 1999 and 2000, which ultimately booted Milošević out of power (see Vladisavljević, 2008; 2016). The regime change pushed the country strongly in the direction of democracy, economic reform, regional co-operation and EU integration, and the new democracy survived several highly contested election cycles.…”
Section: Authoritarianism and Cultural And Artistic Dissent In Serbiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milošević used nationalism instrumentally to gain public support at the time of federal and multinational Yugoslavia’s bloody collapse and suppressed opposition parties and civil society. Large waves of popular mobilization broke out against the regime in 1991, 1992, 1996–1997, 1999 and 2000, which ultimately booted Milošević out of power (see Vladisavljević, 2008; 2016). The regime change pushed the country strongly in the direction of democracy, economic reform, regional co-operation and EU integration, and the new democracy survived several highly contested election cycles.…”
Section: Authoritarianism and Cultural And Artistic Dissent In Serbiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Akademska istraživanja u Srbiji bavila su se protestima pre svega iz ugla psihologije, sociologije i politikologije (Babović et al, 1997;Čupić, 1998;Ku-zmanović, 2003;Popadić, 2003;Vladisavljević, 2011;2014a), dok je relativno malo istraživanja koja su protestima pristupala iz komunikološke perspektive (Dragić et al, 2003;Babović et al, 2017;Krstić, Parry & Aiello, 2017). S obzirom na značaj unutrašnjeg i spoljašnjeg komuniciranje demonstranata za realizaciju ciljeva protesta, proučavanje medijatizovane i neposredne komunikacije, oko i unutar protesta, neopravdano je zanemareno.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…CM : Communication and Media XIII(43) 29-48 © 2018 CDI stikom novouspostavljenog višepartijskog sistema -apsolutnom dominacijom jedne partije u društvu i na političkoj sceni Srbije, nasuprot kojoj se nalazila razjedinjena opozicija, sklona "neprirodnim" koalicijama i radikalnim prepozicioniranjima. Slično je i posle parlamentarnih izbora iz 2012. godine, s tim što je na vlasti stabilna i ideološki "neprirodna" koalicija na čelu sa dominantnom partijom, hegemonom na partijskoj sceni (Pavlović & Antonić, 2007;Jovanović, 2008;Orlović, 2008;Vučićević, 2016;Vladisavljević, 2016).…”
Section: Siniša Atlagićunclassified