Competitive Dialogue in EU Procurement 2012
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139152334.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive dialogue in EU law: a critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contracts that must be published are from all public bodies – central and local government, and also publicly funded bodies such as universities and, in some cases, utility companies. Further details on what institutions have to comply with the publication requirements are given in Arrowsmith (2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contracts that must be published are from all public bodies – central and local government, and also publicly funded bodies such as universities and, in some cases, utility companies. Further details on what institutions have to comply with the publication requirements are given in Arrowsmith (2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD was introduced in 2004 by the European Parliament for particularly complex public contracts (European Commission, 2006) with special concern for providing an improved method for awarding such contracts (Arrowsmith and Treumer, 2012). Its introduction could be regarded as evidence of public clients seeking to foster an increased level of collaboration (Plane and Green, 2012).…”
Section: Competitive Dialogue (Cd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International research on CD seems to have mainly concentrated on its legal complexities and consequences, only a limited number of earlier studies have identified practical issues. For example, Arrowsmith and Treumer (2012) critically examine legal difficulties in the application of CD across Europe by describing grey areas and legal complexity. Nagelkerke et al (2008) compare CD with the negotiated procedure regarding room for flexibility.…”
Section: Earlier Studies and Practical Issues Of CDmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was introduced to provide an improved method for awarding complex public contracts (Arrowsmith and Treumer 2012). It is also intended to give public clients a flexible procurement procedure to enable a dialogue concerning all aspects of the contract with several competitors.…”
Section: Competitive Dialogue (Cd)mentioning
confidence: 99%