2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive interactions in sub-boreal birch–spruce forests differ on opposing slope aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At this age the deciduous trees are 3 to 4 m taller than the spruce and cast shade for at least this distance (Lieffers et al 2002). Green and Hawkins (2005) found that plots up to 5 m in radius were better for measurement of competitive status of a subject tree. Lieffers et al (2002) found the present FTG criteria were poorly linked to simulated light levels available to spruce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At this age the deciduous trees are 3 to 4 m taller than the spruce and cast shade for at least this distance (Lieffers et al 2002). Green and Hawkins (2005) found that plots up to 5 m in radius were better for measurement of competitive status of a subject tree. Lieffers et al (2002) found the present FTG criteria were poorly linked to simulated light levels available to spruce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In turn, willow may influence spruce establishment and seedling growth in the shrubland zone. There is evidence to suggest that these competitive relationships are density dependent and vary significantly with aspect (Green & Hawkins 2005). Identifying the magnitude of these interactions and their influence on tree line dynamics is an important avenue for further work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pritchard (2003) and Voicu and Comeau (2006) also found significant site differences in relationships between white spruce growth and transmittance. Green and Hawkins (2005) suggested that competitive interactions may differ between north-facing and south-facing slopes in subboreal mixedwood stands owing to changes in environmental conditions. There are few plant competition studies that examined the influence of environmental factors on competition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%