2019 IEEE Asia Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APEEC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/apeec.2019.8720686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitiveness Evaluation and Research of Electricity Retailers Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the evaluation methods used for the dispatching demand satisfaction indexes of different stakeholders in the power system are similar to generally used evaluation methods. The most commonly used evaluation methods include the analytic hierarchy process [41], [75], [76], fuzzy evaluation method [1], [77], [78], neural network method [79][80][81], and entropy weight method [82].…”
Section: Evaluation Methods Of Satisfaction Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, the evaluation methods used for the dispatching demand satisfaction indexes of different stakeholders in the power system are similar to generally used evaluation methods. The most commonly used evaluation methods include the analytic hierarchy process [41], [75], [76], fuzzy evaluation method [1], [77], [78], neural network method [79][80][81], and entropy weight method [82].…”
Section: Evaluation Methods Of Satisfaction Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the literature [1] uses interval-type fuzzy sets to make full use of the uncertain and fuzzy perception information of the power users themselves, to simplify the description of consumers' satisfaction with the service quality. Reference [78] uses the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to analyze the competitiveness of various types of electricity retailers, to provide constructive suggestions for different types of electricity retailers to formulate strategies and improve their service quality.…”
Section: Evaluation Methods Of Satisfaction Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the nature of the indicators, they can be divided into financial indicators (Xia & Zhang, 2010;Feng & Yi, 2012), non-financial indicators (Zhao, 2015;Sun et al, 2015), and a combination of both (Han et al, 2022;Zhou et al, 2018), based on whether they can be calculated using financial data or not. From the perspective of evaluation index construction, generally speaking, the establishment of the evaluation index system of retail enterprise competition or performance is mostly based on five aspects, such as the retail sustainable perspective (Gleim et al, 2013;Li et al, 2022), the enterprise capability perspective (Niu et al, 2018), the perspective of combining enterprise resources and capabilities (Yu et al, 2019;Okur & Ercan, 2022), the business process perspective (Shi et al, 2017), and the customer demand perspective (Liu et al, 2018;Helm et al, 2018). However, taking customer demand as the origin is more in line with the characteristics and central concept of the new retail model, so this paper focuses on meeting consumer demand and synthesizes the internal and external factors of the enterprise for the construction of indicators.…”
Section: Retail Evaluation Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%