“…), to the rarity and lack of sensitivity of adverse clinical outcomes, to the large potential for confounding biological noises such as baseline endothelial function and immunologic response in patients, and to the difficulty in a priori obtaining a proper treatment effect estimate in order to perform an adequate sample size calculation prior to launching these small trials. The clinical use of glucocorticosteroids on CPB constitutes one example of disappointing clinical results, since these agents, despite their theoretical role in blocking the effects of inflammatory cytokines and the expression of iNOS and COX-2, have repeatedly not resulted in appreciable clinical benefit [128,129], with the possible exception of decreased creatine kinase release and a reduction in the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in two recent double-blind randomized controlled trials [130] (Rubens FD et al; in press). Also controversial has been the role of inhibiting neutrophil infiltration with a monoclonal antibody to C5a, which experimentally results in improved endothelial-dependent relaxation but no demonstrable benefit on myocardial, pulmonary, or mesenteric functional recovery [31,131,132], until one clinical trial demonstrated a dose-dependent inhibition of the generation of complement byproducts, a reduction in leukocyte activation, a 40% reduction in creatine kinase-MB release, a 80% reduction in new cognitive deficits, and a significant reduction in postoperative blood loss [133].…”