2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2009.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementarity and information technology adoption: Local area networks and the Internet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…use binary dummy variables and estimate multi-equation discrete choice models with error components for each strategies' unobservable returns and control for unobserved correlation among the different adoption equations. Similar approaches are used inKretschmer, Miravete and Pernías (2012),Arora, Forman and Yoon (2010), andGentzkow (2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…use binary dummy variables and estimate multi-equation discrete choice models with error components for each strategies' unobservable returns and control for unobserved correlation among the different adoption equations. Similar approaches are used inKretschmer, Miravete and Pernías (2012),Arora, Forman and Yoon (2010), andGentzkow (2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively low switching costs are described by Krishnan and Bhattacharya (2002) in the Dell battery technology case, Bhattacherjee et al (2012) in the web browser market, Zhou et al (2015) in the mobile instant messaging market. In contrast, high switching costs are described by Arora et al (2010) in a study of internet applications and LAN-based operating systems, as well as Augereau and Greenstein (2001) in a study of the adoption of 56K modems. Kauffman et al (2000) describe varied technology adoption costs for ATM networks, while Matzler et al (2015) examine the impact of varied switching costs on the customer satisfaction with IT.…”
Section: Evidence On Switching Costs In Information Technology Investmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this line of reasoning similar findings have been reported by Fabiani [157] who claims that adoption is just one comport of a complex process of change. Furthermore, it has been emphasized that complementarities between multiple technologies should be taken into account while it could affect the adoption decision of (multiple) technologies when it complements or substitutes a technology [167][168][169]. Next, to enable adoption, to develop complementary assets and capabilities and to benefit from innovation, organizations need to learn to adjust the organization to the innovation which it intends to adopt [170].…”
Section: Analysis Of Innovation Adoption Research Trends Based On Bibmentioning
confidence: 99%