2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11133616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary Effect of Knowledge Management Strategy on Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese Firms

Abstract: This study investigated the complementary effect of three orientations of knowledge management (KM) strategy on firm performance: external and internal, explicit and tacit, and exploratory and exploitive. We propose a theoretical framework for examining the synergistic effects of KM strategy on firm performance, and the moderating effect of organizational structure. The complementary effect among these orientations of KM strategy was studied. To test our framework, we conducted a survey with a sample of 345 Ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to a loss of competitive advantage, and necessarily influences the level of performance. This finding is supported by many researchers [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] . The main objective of this data is to test the invariance of the measurement model for both large and medium-sized companies.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This leads to a loss of competitive advantage, and necessarily influences the level of performance. This finding is supported by many researchers [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] . The main objective of this data is to test the invariance of the measurement model for both large and medium-sized companies.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In economic life, knowledge is the most fundamental dynamic (Stewart, 1997) given that an organization's competitive advantage largely depends on its knowledge, or to be slightly more specific, on what it knows, how it uses what it knows, and how fast it can know something new (Al Mulhim, 2017;Cerne et al, 2014;Gomes & Wojahn, 2017;Prusack, 1997). Knowledge comprises of both implicit (tacit) and explicit components; notable, both tacit and explicit components have been widely discussed in literature (AlMulhim, 2020;Andrews & Smits, 2018;Castaneda & Cuellar, 2020;Huie et al, 2020;López-Cabarcos, Srinivasan, Göttling-Oliveira-Monteiro, & Vázquez-Rodríguez, 2019;Muthuveloo et al, 2017;Phong et al, 2018;Song, Li, & Zhao, 2019). Hodgkin (1991) and Haradhan (2016) see tacit knowledge as encompassing a variety of conceptual and sensory information and images that can be brought to bear in an attempt to make sense of something.…”
Section: Concept Of Tacit Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important factor in innovation is knowledge, therefore an organization needs to know how to access and process knowledge [33]. The interaction between tacit and explicit internal knowledge creates organizational knowledge.…”
Section: Management Capability (Mc)mentioning
confidence: 99%