2015
DOI: 10.3390/proteomes3030160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary PTM Profiling of Drug Response in Human Gastric Carcinoma by Immunoaffinity and IMAC Methods with Total Proteome Analysis

Abstract: Gaining insight into normal cellular signaling and disease biology is a critical goal of proteomic analyses. The ability to perform these studies successfully to extract the maximum value and discovery of biologically relevant candidate biomarkers is therefore of primary importance. Many successful studies in the past have focused on total proteome analysis (changes at the protein level) combined with phosphorylation analysis by metal affinity enrichment (changes at the PTM level). Here, we use the gastric car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous reports, upon ST treatment we observed a decrease in phosphorylation with phospho-C-MET (pY1234 and pY1235) and a more significant decrease upon SU treatment. Total C-MET levels, in contrast, were consistent throughout the control and treatment conditions (as observed by Stokes and coworkers) [18]. After confirming consistency between control Western blots and the previous work, we combined protein lysates from the light and heavy SILAC pairs (1:1, by total protein mass) and prepared the material for Affi-BAMS assay to monitor phospho-C-MET (pY1234 and pY1235) levels in response to treatment with ST or SU inhibition.…”
Section: Quantitation Via Silac: Kinase Inhibitorssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with previous reports, upon ST treatment we observed a decrease in phosphorylation with phospho-C-MET (pY1234 and pY1235) and a more significant decrease upon SU treatment. Total C-MET levels, in contrast, were consistent throughout the control and treatment conditions (as observed by Stokes and coworkers) [18]. After confirming consistency between control Western blots and the previous work, we combined protein lysates from the light and heavy SILAC pairs (1:1, by total protein mass) and prepared the material for Affi-BAMS assay to monitor phospho-C-MET (pY1234 and pY1235) levels in response to treatment with ST or SU inhibition.…”
Section: Quantitation Via Silac: Kinase Inhibitorssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As SIS peptides may not always be readily customized to perform quantitative experiments on targets of interest for a highly multiplexed Affi-BAMS assays using a cell line model, we demonstrate that a classical light and heavy Stable Isotope Labeling by/with Amino Acids in Cell Culture (SILAC) experiment is well suited for quantitative Affi-BAMS analyses [45]. To demonstrate this application, we cultured MKN45 (a C-MET driven cancer cell line) under light and heavy SILAC conditions (light = kinase inhibitor, heavy = DMSO; K+8 and R+10) and treated cells with either 0.2 µM Staurosporine (ST, protein kinase C [PKC] inhibitor) or 1.0 µM SU11274 (SU, C-MET inhibitor) for 2 h (see Methods) as described by Stokes and colleagues [18]. We performed Western blots for both total C-MET and phospho-C-MET (pY1234 and pY1235) to confirm inhibition by both kinase inhibitors prior to performing subsequent Affi-BAMS assays ( Figure 7A,B).…”
Section: Quantitation Via Silac: Kinase Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cellular extracts were sonicated, centrifuged, reduced with dithiothreitol, and alkylated with iodoacetamide. For phosphorylated protein analysis, 500 μg total protein was digested with trypsin, purified over C18 columns (Waters), and used for immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) enrichment with Fe‐NTA magnetic beads (CST ® ) as previously described 11 . For total protein analysis, 100 μg of each sample was digested with LysC/trypsin, labeled with TMT10plex TM reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), bRP fractionated (96 fractions concatenated nonsequentially to 12), and C18 purified as previously described 12 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were analyzed using the PTMScan method as described previously (49,50). Cellular extracts were prepared in urea lysis buffer, sonicated, centrifuged, reduced with DTT, and alkylated with iodoacetamide.…”
Section: Proteomics Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%