2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete and robust no-fit polygon generation for the irregular stock cutting problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
76
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem can be further classified by the type of items that are to be placed. Whereas the rectangular (or orthogonal) problem involves the placement of rectangles onto rectangular stock sheets (Baker et al 1980, Hopper andTurton 1999), the irregular variant can involve items and sheets of any two-dimensional form that may contain arcs, concavities, and holes (Burke et al 2006), and typically require more sophisticated geometric algorithms (Bennell and Song 2008, Burke et al 2007, Bennell et al 2001. Three-dimensional problems are generally constrained to the packing of boxes into regular container boxes (i.e., pallet or lorry loading), although the packing of irregular three-dimensional forms has also been attempted (Stoyan et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem can be further classified by the type of items that are to be placed. Whereas the rectangular (or orthogonal) problem involves the placement of rectangles onto rectangular stock sheets (Baker et al 1980, Hopper andTurton 1999), the irregular variant can involve items and sheets of any two-dimensional form that may contain arcs, concavities, and holes (Burke et al 2006), and typically require more sophisticated geometric algorithms (Bennell and Song 2008, Burke et al 2007, Bennell et al 2001. Three-dimensional problems are generally constrained to the packing of boxes into regular container boxes (i.e., pallet or lorry loading), although the packing of irregular three-dimensional forms has also been attempted (Stoyan et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The no-fit polygon gives the set of non-overlapping placements for a given pair of polygons. Good examples of this type of procedure that work well for the strip packing problem are described by Hu-yao and Yuan-jun (2006), Gomes and Oliveira (2002), Dowsland et al (2002), Burke and Kendall (1999b), Burke et al (2007). While the no-fit polygon is a powerful geometric technique, there are several issues that limit its scalability for industrial applications.…”
Section: The 2d Irregular Bin Packing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No-fit polygon techniques are notorious for the large quantity of degenerate cases that must be handled to make it completely robust (Burke et al 2006). Whilst the generation of the no-fit polygon is academically challenging, it is a tool and not a solution (Burke et al 2007). After generating the possible placement positions, it is necessary to have some criteria for choosing the best position.…”
Section: The 2d Irregular Bin Packing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li and Milenkovic [14] decomposed the items into star-shaped polygons. Burke et al [15] proposed an orbiting algorithm in which the movable item slides along the fixed item.…”
Section: E-mail Address: Mtsuzuki@uspbr (Msg Tsuzuki)mentioning
confidence: 99%