2012
DOI: 10.1080/08927022.2012.683527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete basis set, hybrid-DFT study and NBO interpretation of conformational analysis of 2-methoxytetrahydropyran and its thiopyran and selenopyran analogues in relation to the anomeric effect

Abstract: 2-Methoxytetrahydropyran (1), -thiopyran (2) and -selenopyran (3) have been chosen as model compounds to investigate the origin of the anomeric effect (AE). The impacts of the hyperconjugation, electrostatic and steric interactions on the conformational preferences of compounds 1 -3 have been analysed by means of complete basis set-4, hybrid-density functional theory (B3LYP/6-311 þ G**) based methods and natural bond orbital (NBO) interpretation. Both levels of theory showed that the axial conformations of com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the anometic effect [ 264 ], the axial conformation of 2-methoxytetrahydropyran and 2-fluorotetrahydropyran is favoured by 1.27 and 2.45 kcal mol −1 , respectively, over the equatorial according to the accurate CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVDZ//MP2/6-311G(2df,2pd) calculations [ 265 ]. The conformational preferences of 2-methoxytetrahydropyran have been investigated using Dynamic NMR [ 266 ] and calculations [ 267 269 ] and for 2-fluorotetrahydropyran experimental and calculated 1 J C-F values and conformational energy calculations have been used [ 270 272 ] and calculations. Our DLPNO-CCSD(T) calculations show this difference to be 1.21 and 2.43 kcal mol −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the anometic effect [ 264 ], the axial conformation of 2-methoxytetrahydropyran and 2-fluorotetrahydropyran is favoured by 1.27 and 2.45 kcal mol −1 , respectively, over the equatorial according to the accurate CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVDZ//MP2/6-311G(2df,2pd) calculations [ 265 ]. The conformational preferences of 2-methoxytetrahydropyran have been investigated using Dynamic NMR [ 266 ] and calculations [ 267 269 ] and for 2-fluorotetrahydropyran experimental and calculated 1 J C-F values and conformational energy calculations have been used [ 270 272 ] and calculations. Our DLPNO-CCSD(T) calculations show this difference to be 1.21 and 2.43 kcal mol −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kasaei et al collected some experimental values from the literature in the range from 0.4 kcal mol −1 to 0.9 kcal mol −1 . 27 They predicted Δ G value of 0.99 kcal mol −1 for MTHP in the gas phase using the CBS-4 method. 27 This Δ G is comparable with the MP2/ΔG/ZPE/aug-cc-pVTZ calculated value of 0.92 kcal mol −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 They predicted Δ G value of 0.99 kcal mol −1 for MTHP in the gas phase using the CBS-4 method. 27 This Δ G is comparable with the MP2/ΔG/ZPE/aug-cc-pVTZ calculated value of 0.92 kcal mol −1 . For MT his CBS-4 calculated value of 1.92 kcal mol −1 is also comparable to 2.09 kcal mol −1 calculated at the MP2/ΔG/ZPE/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NBO calculations provides a reasonable picture from the structural, energetic, bonding and stereo electronic points of view 31 . DFT level computation is used to investigate the various second-order inter-actions between the filled orbitals of one subsystem and vacant orbital of another subsystem 32 .…”
Section: Natural Bond Orbital (Nbo) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%