2017
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete diastereodivergence in asymmetric 1,6-addition reactions enabled by minimal modification of a chiral catalyst

Abstract: Catalytic systems that allow selective generation of any diastereomer of a reaction product bearing multiple stereocentres through minimal modification of a single catalyst scaffold remain elusive, particularly for carbon–carbon bond formations requiring simultaneous control of multiple selectivity factors. Here, we report a catalyst-directed pinpoint inversion of diastereochemical preference in the 1,6-addition of azlactones to δ-aryl dienyl carbonyl compounds with full control over other selectivities preser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Having identified the catalyst capable of promoting a 1,4‐selective reaction with rigorous control of stereoselectivity, we turned our attention to search for a catalyst effective for overturning the regiochemical preference to 1,6‐selectivity while conserving a comparable level of stereocontrol, thereby establishing a site‐divergent stereoselective Michael reaction protocol. Toward this end, we used the P ‐spiro chiral triaminoiminophosphorane 2 as a catalyst, considering the unique ability of its conjugate acid 2 ⋅H to recognize both a nucleophile and an electrophile through hydrogen‐bonding interactions, thus providing an unusual mutual orientation in the transition state for the subsequent bond formation ,. Interestingly, the reaction of 3 a with 4 in the presence of the l ‐valine‐derived 2 a in Et 2 O at 0 °C selectively afforded 1,6‐γ‐ Z , E ‐ 5 a ( vi ) in high yield with excellent enantioselectivity (Table , entry 8).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having identified the catalyst capable of promoting a 1,4‐selective reaction with rigorous control of stereoselectivity, we turned our attention to search for a catalyst effective for overturning the regiochemical preference to 1,6‐selectivity while conserving a comparable level of stereocontrol, thereby establishing a site‐divergent stereoselective Michael reaction protocol. Toward this end, we used the P ‐spiro chiral triaminoiminophosphorane 2 as a catalyst, considering the unique ability of its conjugate acid 2 ⋅H to recognize both a nucleophile and an electrophile through hydrogen‐bonding interactions, thus providing an unusual mutual orientation in the transition state for the subsequent bond formation ,. Interestingly, the reaction of 3 a with 4 in the presence of the l ‐valine‐derived 2 a in Et 2 O at 0 °C selectively afforded 1,6‐γ‐ Z , E ‐ 5 a ( vi ) in high yield with excellent enantioselectivity (Table , entry 8).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this intrinsic problem, a series of ingenious strategies have been developed for asymmetric diastereodivergent catalysis [33][34][35] , such as using distinct catalysts [36][37][38] , change of metal cations 39 , and ligands 40,41 of the catalysts, change of reaction conditions 42,43 , stereodivergent dual catalysis [44][45][46][47][48][49][50] and stepwise control [51][52][53][54] . Nevertheless, achieving asymmetric diastereodivergent catalysis through modifications of one single type of chiral catalysts remains elusive 55,56 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…并通过催化剂骨架拉近两个反应物 的距离, 从而提高反应转化率和选择性 [13] . 近年来 此后, Ooi 小组 [16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] 通过类似的策略, 基于手 性氨基酸、手性联萘二胺和手性二苯乙二胺等成熟的二 胺合成子开发了一系列的手性螺环鏻盐(2~5, 图 3), 并 将其作为膦腈碱催化剂的前体用于各种各样的不对称 化学反应中, 取得了丰硕的成果. 3a, R 1 = R 2 = R 3 = Me, Ar = 4-ClC 6 H 4 X = Cl; 3b, R 1 = R 2 = R 3 = Me, Ar = Ph; 3c, R 1 = Me, R 2 = Et, R 3 = Me, Ar = Ph; 3d, R 1 = R 2 = R 3 = Me, Ar = Ph, X = t BuCO 2 ; 3e, R 1 = H, R 2 = i Pr, R 3 = Me, Ar = 4-FC 6 H 4 ; 3f, R 1 = H, R 2 = Pr, R 3 = Me, Ar = 3-MeC 6 H 4 ; 3g, R 1 = Me, R 2 = Et, R 3 = Me, Ar = Ph; 3h, R 1 = Me, R 2 = Et, R 3 = Et Ar = Ph; 3i, R 1 = Me, R 2 = Et, R 3 = Me, Ar = 3,5-Cl 2 C 6 H 3 ; 3j, R 1 = Me, R 2 = Et, R 3 = Me, Ar = 3-FC 6 H 4 ; 3k, R 1 = R 2 = -(CH 2 ) 5 -, R 3 [20][21] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%