2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1730-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete mitochondrial genomes of four entomopathogenic nematode species of the genus Steinernema

Abstract: BackgroundNematodes belonging to the genus Steinernema are insect parasites and are used as effective biological agents against soil-dwelling insect pests. Although the full nuclear genomes of multiple Steinernema species have become available recently, mitochondrial genome information for the genus is limited. In this study, we sequenced the complete mitochondrial genomes of four species of Steinernema and analysed their structure, codon usage and phylogenetic relationships.ResultsMitochondrial genomes of Ste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To make sure that these duplicated sequences are not artefacts from our own PCR amplification or numt s [ 28 ], we have extracted DNA from an additional C. cotti specimen and amplified, sequenced and assembled its entire genome anew. The sequences were identical, apart from the minor variations expected among individual mitogenomes [ 29 ], thus excluding the possibility of a mistake in the sequencing and assembly process. Unfortunately, these two nematodes were obtained from the same fish specimen, so we cannot directly exclude the possibility of this unique architecture being a lineage-specific phenomenon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make sure that these duplicated sequences are not artefacts from our own PCR amplification or numt s [ 28 ], we have extracted DNA from an additional C. cotti specimen and amplified, sequenced and assembled its entire genome anew. The sequences were identical, apart from the minor variations expected among individual mitogenomes [ 29 ], thus excluding the possibility of a mistake in the sequencing and assembly process. Unfortunately, these two nematodes were obtained from the same fish specimen, so we cannot directly exclude the possibility of this unique architecture being a lineage-specific phenomenon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is also found in the mt genomes of entomopathogenic nematodes and plant-parasitic nematodes. For example, the lengths of the complete mt genomes of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema litorale and the plant-parasitic nematode Pratylenchus vulnus are 21,403 bp and 21,656 bp in size, respectively; however, the size of the non-coding regions was extremely long ( S. litorale , 8,137 bp; P. vulnus , 7,748 bp) (Sultana et al, 2013 ; Taisei et al, 2016 ). The total A+T contents of three worms mtDNA of this study were consistent with those of most nematode mt genomes characterized to date, such as T. brevicauda (77.0%) and Wuchereria bancrofti (74.6%) (Ramesh et al, 2012 ; Duan et al, 2015 ), whereas the percentages of A+T content are remarkably higher than those of trematodes and protozoa, such as Echinostoma hortense (63.03%) and Eimeria magna (65.16%) (Tian et al, 2015 ; Liu et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shared gene clusters between A. varius and Panagrolaimomorpha species are also very limited: trnT +nad4, trnH +rrnL+nad3, trnP+trnM, nad6 +nad4L+trnW, nad2+trnI and trnN +trnF are shared with Rhabditophanes sp. KR3021 (Hunt et al, 2016), nad4L+trnW, trnH +rrnL+nad3, nad2+trnI, cox3+trnE and trnT +nad4 are shared with Parastrongyloides trichosuri (Hunt et al, 2016), trnH +rrnL+nad3, nad4L+trnW, nad2+trnI and trnT +nad4 are shared with S. carpocapsae (Montiel et al, 2006) and trnH +rrnL+nad3, nad6 +nad4L+trnW, nad2+trnI and trnT +nad4 are shared with S. glaseri, S. litorale, S. kushidai (Kikuchi, Afrin & Yoshida, 2016), H. gingivalis (Kim et al, 2015) and P. redivivus (GenBank accession no. AP017464.1; Clark et al, 2016).…”
Section: Comparison Of Mitochondrial Gene Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%