2006
DOI: 10.1007/11754602_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete Propagation Rules for Lexicographic Order Constraints over Arbitrary Domains

Abstract: Abstract. We give an efficiently executable specification of the global constraint of lexicographic order in the Constraint Handling Rules (CHR) language. In contrast to previous approaches, the implementation is short and concise without giving up on the best known worst case time complexity. It is incremental and concurrent by nature of CHR. It is provably correct and confluent. It is independent of the underlying constraint system, and therefore not restricted to finite domains. We have found a direct recur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lexicographic order. Frühwirth (2006a) presented a constraint solver for a lexicographic order constraint in terms of inequality constraints offered by the underlying solver. The approach is general in that it can be used for any constraint domain offering inequality (less-than) constraints between problem variables.…”
Section: Constraint Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lexicographic order. Frühwirth (2006a) presented a constraint solver for a lexicographic order constraint in terms of inequality constraints offered by the underlying solver. The approach is general in that it can be used for any constraint domain offering inequality (less-than) constraints between problem variables.…”
Section: Constraint Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the lexicographic order constraint [2][3][4]. Given two sequences L 1 and L 2 of variables of the same length, then lex holds if L 1 is lexicographically smaller than or equal to L 2 .…”
Section: Example 1 (Motivation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison we find that the backward reasoning rules are not subsumed by our combined lex solver rendering the solver incomplete. In the case of the lex solver of [4], rules (8), (7), (10), and (9) are applied in that order and further constrain the domains of the variables to: …”
Section: Combined Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%