Computability and Models 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0755-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Completeness and Universality of Arithmetical Numberings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In what follows, we denote by the inverse Fourier transform of the Butterworth filter as a function in the variable (5) Convergence Criterion of the Adaptive ILC: In [19] and [20] a rigorous convergence analysis for a similar adaptive ILC has been carried out. Next, we prove briefly the convergence of the applied adaptive algorithm by use of an uniform version of the fixed point theorem [21]. As explained in [8], in the case when the adaptive filter is used, the update formula (2) remains the same while (1) becomes (6) known as the nonstationary convolutional integral [22], [23] which is an extension of the convolutional method to nonstationary processes.…”
Section: Ilc With Adaptive Robustness Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, we denote by the inverse Fourier transform of the Butterworth filter as a function in the variable (5) Convergence Criterion of the Adaptive ILC: In [19] and [20] a rigorous convergence analysis for a similar adaptive ILC has been carried out. Next, we prove briefly the convergence of the applied adaptive algorithm by use of an uniform version of the fixed point theorem [21]. As explained in [8], in the case when the adaptive filter is used, the update formula (2) remains the same while (1) becomes (6) known as the nonstationary convolutional integral [22], [23] which is an extension of the convolutional method to nonstationary processes.…”
Section: Ilc With Adaptive Robustness Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N → X is a numbering of X [1,18,19,21,22] def ⇔ ψ is onto. 4 We will often write ψ p as shorthand for ψ(p).…”
Section: Introduction: Krt and Fprtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducibility of numberings is a pre-order relation on Com 0 n+1 (A), which induces, in the usual way, a quotient structure R 0 n+1 (A), an upper semilattice, called the Rogers semilattice of Σ 0 n+1 -computable numberings of the family A. We refer the reader to [2,4] for details on Σ 0 n+1 -computable numberings and related topics.THEOREM. For every k ∈ N , there exist infinitely many infinite Σ 0 k+1 -computable families with pairwise elementarily different Rogers semilattices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the classical case of computable families of computably enumerable sets, it was shown that there exist infinitely many families with pairwise elementarily different theories of Rogers semilattices (see [1]). Nevertheless, resent studies on Rogers semilattices of arithmetic numberings for infinite families of sets at levels greater than one in the Kleene-Mostowsky hierarchy have revealed the following: -significant differences as regards algebraic and elementary properties of the semilattices in question compared with the classical case;-homogeneity of the structure of their ideals and intervals (see [2][3][4][5]). Initially, this led to the conjecture that the Rogers semilattices for infinite families of sets of any fixed high level of the arithmetic hierarchy would have similar properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation