2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.94.104066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Completion of metric reconstruction for a particle orbiting a Kerr black hole

Abstract: Vacuum perturbations of the Kerr metric can be reconstructed from the corresponding perturbation in either of the two Weyl scalars ψ0 or ψ4, using a procedure described by Chrzanowski and others in the 1970s. More recent work, motivated within the context of self-force physics, extends the procedure to metric perturbations sourced by a particle in a bound geodesic orbit. However, the existing procedure leaves undetermined a certain stationary, axially-symmetric piece of the metric perturbation. In the vacuum r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
91
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past few years there has been progress in the development of time-domain methods based on the Teukolsky formalism, with the idea of computing the self-force from a radiation-gauge metric perturbation constructed from numerical, time-domain solutions of the spin-±2 Teukolsky equation [86][87][88][89][90]. This offers improved computational efficiency (since one has to solve a single scalar-like equation instead of 10 coupled equations in the Lorenz-gauge method), and also entirely circumvents the complications involved in computing the Lorenz-gauge monopole and dipole modes [91,92]. The implementation of this method in 1+1-dimensions appears to be numerically efficient even in the Kerr case, where mode-coupling has to be accounted for [93,94].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past few years there has been progress in the development of time-domain methods based on the Teukolsky formalism, with the idea of computing the self-force from a radiation-gauge metric perturbation constructed from numerical, time-domain solutions of the spin-±2 Teukolsky equation [86][87][88][89][90]. This offers improved computational efficiency (since one has to solve a single scalar-like equation instead of 10 coupled equations in the Lorenz-gauge method), and also entirely circumvents the complications involved in computing the Lorenz-gauge monopole and dipole modes [91,92]. The implementation of this method in 1+1-dimensions appears to be numerically efficient even in the Kerr case, where mode-coupling has to be accounted for [93,94].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, these self-force terms were shown to be precisely proportional to a( 1 4 ) and a ( 1 4 ), respectively, where a(u) denotes the self-force piece of the basic radial potential A(u; ν) = 1 − 2u + νa(u) + O(ν 2 ) of EOB dynamics; see Eqs. (91) below. [Here, u := (M + µ)/r EOB , while ν := µM/(M + µ) 2 = η/(1 + η) 2 denotes the symmetric mass ratio.]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this operator is not injective, this inversion is ambiguous up to an element of its kernel. The gauge-invariant content of this kernel is simply given by a shift in mass and angular momentum of the system [52], and can be extracted unambiguously [53]. As shown in Ref.…”
Section: The Teukolsky-mst-cck Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this case the ratio of the particle mass µ to that of the Kerr black hole M Kerr serves as a small expansion parameter. While SF results for Kerr are still in development [67][68][69][70], mounting evidence suggests that SF results may be extended much closer to the nearly equal mass cases than expected [71][72][73], which is the regime appropriate for our our high (but not extreme) mass ratio binaries. Meanwhile, the lowest order approximation to the SF-expansion, namely the test particle limit, incorporates the effects of strongly curved spacetime, highly relativistic motion, and is fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%