2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.105707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex abdominal wall reconstruction after oncologic resection in a sequalae of giant omphalocele: A case report

Abstract: Highlights Giant liver congenital anterior abdominal wall defect untreated in adulthood. Hepatoblastoma in adult. Large full-thickness complex abdominal wall defect after oncologic resection. Surgical experience of the team on the integrity and functional prognostic of the abdominal wall reconstruction. Place of the combined acellular dermal matrix and skin graft as a permanent solution in abdominal wall reconstruction. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature of the composite mesh makes it prone to providing lasting abdominal support through its safe placement directly onto the bowel, resistance to degradation in vitro and excellent biocompatibility[ 19 , 20 ]. Trauma injuries and tumor resection are the most common causes of large abdominal wall defects[ 16 , 21 ]. Complete resection of abdominal wall lesions is feasible, but preoperative assessment of the defect is the primary consideration for appropriate abdominal reconstruction[ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of the composite mesh makes it prone to providing lasting abdominal support through its safe placement directly onto the bowel, resistance to degradation in vitro and excellent biocompatibility[ 19 , 20 ]. Trauma injuries and tumor resection are the most common causes of large abdominal wall defects[ 16 , 21 ]. Complete resection of abdominal wall lesions is feasible, but preoperative assessment of the defect is the primary consideration for appropriate abdominal reconstruction[ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%