2004
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.200400235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex Formation of 2, 6‐Bis‐(2′‐hydroxyphenyl)pyridine with AlIII, FeIII and CuII

Abstract: Complex formation of 2, 6‐bis(2′‐hydroxyphenyl)pyridine (H2Li) with Fe3+ and Cu2+ was investigated in a H2O/DMSO medium (mole fraction xDMSO = 0.2) by potentiometric and spectrophotometric methods. The pKa values of [H3Li]+ are 2.25, 10.51 and 14.0 (25 °C, 0.1 M KCl). The formation constants of [FeIII(Li)]+ and [CuII(Li)] (25 °C, 0.1 M KCl) are log β1 = 21.5 for Fe3+ and log β1 = 18.5 for Cu2+. The crystal structures of [Al(Li)2Na(EtOH)3], [Fe(Li)2Na(EtOH)3], and [Cu(Li)(py)]2 were investigated by single‐cryst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, one equivalent of NTA does not change the spectrum of a solution of Cu–deferasirox at all, indicating that deferasirox is significantly stronger than NTA for Cu 2+ binding (Fig. 6), which is consistent with the known stability constants of deferasirox for Cu 2+ of 18.8 and 23.9 for log β 1 and log β 2 , respectively [30]. Additionally, we tested the strength of binding of deferasirox to copper using EDTA, which has a higher affinity for Cu 2+ than NTA, with a log β 1 value of 18.78 [31].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, one equivalent of NTA does not change the spectrum of a solution of Cu–deferasirox at all, indicating that deferasirox is significantly stronger than NTA for Cu 2+ binding (Fig. 6), which is consistent with the known stability constants of deferasirox for Cu 2+ of 18.8 and 23.9 for log β 1 and log β 2 , respectively [30]. Additionally, we tested the strength of binding of deferasirox to copper using EDTA, which has a higher affinity for Cu 2+ than NTA, with a log β 1 value of 18.78 [31].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The change in spectrum of TIP upon the addition of Cu 2+ suggests that even in its prochelator form, TIP retains binding capacity for cupric ions. Notable also is a weak band centered ~650 nm that can be observed at higher concentrations of TIP plus Cu 2+ (not shown), which is very similar to the d-d band observed for Cu 2+ complexed to deferasirox [30]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…As described above, 1 , 2 , and 3 form a 2:1 chelator/iron complex at physiological pH with high stability constant . Compound 3 also has a moderate affinity for Cu 2+ as demonstrated by the value of 18.8 for log β (CuL), and 23.9 for log β 2 (CuL 2 ) reported elsewhere . As observed for iron, we anticipate the conjugation with CyD does not significantly modify the copper‐binding ability of the chelators .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…[27,28] Compound 3 also has amoderate affinity for Cu 2 + as demonstrated by the value of 18.8 for log b (CuL), and 23.9 forl og b 2 (CuL 2 ) reported elsewhere. [38] As observed for iron, we anticipatet he conjugation with CyD does not significantly modify the copper-binding ability of the chelators. [12,31] Moreover,w ec onfirmed through UV/Vis and CD spectroscopy that both derivatives maintain the ability of 3 to complex copper ions.…”
Section: Effect On A-synuclein Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Coordination of two metal ions by salpahn À will form a five-membered chelate ring on one metal centre and a six-membered chelate ring on the other metal centre. It is known that the ligands which form five-membered chelate rings prefer large metal ions and the ligands which form six-membered chelate rings prefer small metal ions [40]. For this reason, possibly salpahn À behaves as tridentate and binds a single trivalent iron centre with the formation of two six-membered chelate Symmetry transformations used to generate the equivalent atoms: (a) Àx + 3/2, Ày + 3/2, Àz, (b) Àx + 3/2, Ày + 1/2, Àz, (c) Àx + 3/2, y À 1/2, Àz À 1/2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%