2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2013.11.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex formation of Sn(II) with l-cysteine: An IR, DTA/TGA and DFT Investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two absorption peaks at 2552 and 942 cm –1 , which are attributed to characteristic peaks of the R-SH group in l -cysteine, disappear in the mixed solution of SnCl 2 and l -cysteine. It clearly indicates that l -cysteine is coordinated to tin (II) cation through sulfur atom. ,, Another two peaks at 2082 and 1532 cm –1 of the R-NH 2 group are also absent in the chelate complex, representing the coordination between Sn 2+ and nitrogen atom. , Furthermore, there is no significant change about the characteristic peaks of the R-COOH group, with a slight shifting of one peak from 1588 to 1658 cm –1 , which suggests unfavorable formation of an Sn–O bond. , According to the FT-IR results, the typical molecular structure of the chelate complex is illustrated as shown in Figure b, which is characterized by the bonding among Sn 2+ , sulfur, and nitrogen atoms. Worth noting is that the electrospun fibers after preoxidation show the similar FT-IR characteristic peaks as those in the chelate complex, demonstrating the stability of bonding states (Figure S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two absorption peaks at 2552 and 942 cm –1 , which are attributed to characteristic peaks of the R-SH group in l -cysteine, disappear in the mixed solution of SnCl 2 and l -cysteine. It clearly indicates that l -cysteine is coordinated to tin (II) cation through sulfur atom. ,, Another two peaks at 2082 and 1532 cm –1 of the R-NH 2 group are also absent in the chelate complex, representing the coordination between Sn 2+ and nitrogen atom. , Furthermore, there is no significant change about the characteristic peaks of the R-COOH group, with a slight shifting of one peak from 1588 to 1658 cm –1 , which suggests unfavorable formation of an Sn–O bond. , According to the FT-IR results, the typical molecular structure of the chelate complex is illustrated as shown in Figure b, which is characterized by the bonding among Sn 2+ , sulfur, and nitrogen atoms. Worth noting is that the electrospun fibers after preoxidation show the similar FT-IR characteristic peaks as those in the chelate complex, demonstrating the stability of bonding states (Figure S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…PVP/metal salt/ l -cysteine and PAN are chosen as the precursors of the core and shell layer, separately. l -Cysteine possesses three different ligands, namely, a thiol group (R-SH), carboxyl group (R-COOH), and amino group (R-NH 2 ), which are expected to bond with metal ions to form a chelate complex. The key to prepare metal sulfides using the electrospinning technique is the formation of bonds between metal cations and R-SH of l -cysteine. FT-IR spectroscopy was conducted to determine the bonding states between SnCl 2 and l -cysteine, as shown in Figure c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a carboxylate group binding to the metal ion frequently forms the O=C—O – structure with a strong C=O stretching peak at the region of ∼1640–1740 cm –1 . 29,30 In the spectrum of CdSe-Cys, however, no such peak was observed. Thus, we tentatively postulate that the carboxylate group of ligand–cysteine has the (O–C–O) − structure, where an electron is delocalized equally over the two oxygen atoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The weight loss percentage analysis (TG graphs) shows four similar degradation steps for both compounds with weight loss of 9.4, 18.1, 17.2, and 26.2% for ZGluGO ( Figure 3 a, DTG graph: 92.6, 191.2, 364.8, and 502.6–563.6 °C, respectively) and 8.3, 15.5, 18.7, and 26.5% for ZAspGO ( Figure 3 b, DTG graph: 103.9, 185.1, 320.3, and 431.4–542.5 °C). The first degradation step presents the lowest percentage of weight loss (9.4 and 8.3%), which can be attributed to the evaporation of water on the surface of the material [ 44 ]. The second degradation step represents the loss of water of crystallization and the initial decomposition of organic components.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%