2019
DOI: 10.1038/s42254-018-0010-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex lasers with controllable coherence

Abstract: The invention of lasers 60 years ago is one of the greatest breakthroughs in modern optics. Throughout the years, lasers have enabled major scientific and technological advancements, and have been exploited in numerous applications due to their advantages such as high brightness and high coherence. However, the high spatial coherence of laser illumination is not always desirable, as it can cause adverse artifacts such as speckle noise in imaging applications. To reduce the spatial coherence of a laser, novel c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
107
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
4
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different from the WGM laser made by incorporating the wr-PNDs in the microcavity as demonstrated above, the powder sample itself can work as a random laser without the need of optical coupling with an external cavity resonator 38 . In general, random lasing does not require a well-confined laser cavity but relies on multiple light scattering in a disordered scattering medium [39][40][41] . As a result, random lasers have lower coherence than the lasers based on optical cavities, thus ensuring their application in speckle-free imaging and bioimaging 42 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from the WGM laser made by incorporating the wr-PNDs in the microcavity as demonstrated above, the powder sample itself can work as a random laser without the need of optical coupling with an external cavity resonator 38 . In general, random lasing does not require a well-confined laser cavity but relies on multiple light scattering in a disordered scattering medium [39][40][41] . As a result, random lasers have lower coherence than the lasers based on optical cavities, thus ensuring their application in speckle-free imaging and bioimaging 42 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clear assessment of random lasing action, as given by the evidence of g (2) reducing to unity, has, to date, been very challenging and expensive, requiring picosecond or femtosecond lasers and singlephoton detectors. However, assessing random lasing -and similarly other kinds of complex lasers -is essential for the progress of the field, which is already reaching technological applications, ranging from lowcoherence imaging 56 to superresolution spectroscopy (A. Boschetti, A. Taschin, P. Bartolini, A. K. Tiwari, L. Pattelli, R. Torre and D. Wiersma, personal communication) to sensing 10 and many others 6 .…”
Section: The Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be achieved by using multimode lasers with low and tunable spatial coherence [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The decoherence time of such lasers, critical for fast speckle suppression in short integration times, is determined by the frequency spacing and linewidth of the individual lasing modes, as well as the total width of the emission spectrum ΔΩ [20]. Let us consider N transverse modes lasing simultaneously and assume that the linewidth of each individual transverse mode is smaller than the typical frequency spacing Δω t of neighboring modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%