Complex ownership structures, corporate governance and firm performance: The French context.

Ducassy, Isabelle; Guyot, Alexis

doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.07.019

Cited by 64 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…La función de la GC es proteger los intereses de los stakeholders y, por tanto, conforme se evidencia en otras investigaciones, la misma tiene el foco centrado en el Consejo de Administración (Adams, Hermalin & Weisbach, 2010;Gaa, 2009;García-Torea, Fernández-Feijoo & De La Cuesta, 2016;Lanis & Richardson, 2011;Ness, Miesing & Kang, 2010); en los ejecutivos y sus compensaciones (Hong, Li & Minor, 2016;Lozano, Martínez & Pindado, 2016); en el control de las corporaciones y en la estructura de propiedad (Abdallah & Ismail, 2017;Ararat, Black & Yurtoglu, 2017;Ducassy & Guyot, 2017); así como se centra en las políticas económicas de las corporaciones (Akbar, et al, 2016;Briano-Turrent & Rodríguez-Ariza, 2016;Shawtari, et al, 2016;Villanueva-Villar, Rivo-López & Lago-Peñas, 2016).…”

Section: Gobernanza Corporativaunclassified

Gobernanza Corporativa y Gobernanza Corporativa de TI utilizando Analytic Hierarchy Process en la creación de valor

Vanti

Solana-González

Seibert

2018

RISTI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ambas vinculadas con los objetivos corporativos porque presentan a la empresa de manera más segura y sostenible a los stakeholders y a la sociedad en general, aumentando su diferencial competitivo. En este sentido de crear valor para satisfacer las necesidades de las partes interesadas, estructurando sistémicamente la empresa y perfeccionando su proceso decisorio multicriterio es en el que este trabajo integra las dos gobernanzas a través de los criterios de Beneficios, Riesgos y Recursos y de diferentes sub-criterios y alternativas de decisión. Para ello se aplica el método Analytic Hierarchy Process para definir cuáles son las prioridades en GC y GCTI que más valor crean para las empresas. Esta cuestión ha sido respondida generando un modelo teóricopráctico estructurado por medio del Generador de Sistemas de Apoyo a la Decisión. Los resultados encontrados están relacionados con los criterios de Beneficios (55%), Recursos (24%) y Riesgos (21%). Las alternativas prioritarias están vinculadas con decisiones de: inversión y prioridades de TI (32,6%); necesidades de aplicaciones de negocios (24,6%); principios de TI (16,0%); arquitectura de TI (16,0%); e infraestructura de TI (10,8%).

show abstract

Section: Gobernanza Corporativaunclassified

Gobernanza Corporativa y Gobernanza Corporativa de TI utilizando Analytic Hierarchy Process en la creación de valor

Vanti

Solana-González

Seibert

2018

RISTI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They jointly participate in significant decisions and share control rights, thereby avoiding the situation that one of the shareholders has absolute control, and other shareholders are difficult to supervise and control. Foreign authors generally hold that equity restriction can effectively monitor and restrict controlling shareholders and improve corporate performance [7,8]. The government financial institutions contribute negatively, while investors in other countries contribute positively to company performance in accordance with profitability [9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic Panel Threshold Model-Based Analysis on Equity Restriction and Enterprise Performance in China

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper takes China’s A-share listed companies of the mixed ownership of state-owned enterprises from 2007 to 2016 as a sample, and examines the impact of state-owned business mixed reform on corporate performance. Research shows that under different equity restriction ratios, there exists a difference in the connection between corporate performance and equity restriction ratio. Corporate performance reduces with the subjoin of equity restriction ratio, and they are negatively correlated when the stockholding ratio of the largest stockholder is less than 25%; on the condition that the stockholding ratio of the largest stockholder is in the range of 25 and 40% and 40 and 60%, it presents an “inverted U-shaped” connection between corporate performance and equity restriction ratio. At this time, the threshold value of the optimal equity restriction ratio is 1.1336 and 0.7297, respectively. On the condition that the stockholding ratio of the largest stockholder is equal to or more than 60%, there exists no threshold value for equity restriction ratio. However, the regression results present that corporate performance increases with the increase of equity restriction ratio, and the two are positively correlated.

show abstract

“…Majority of the studies investigating the effect of ownership structure on firm performance has been dominated by the developed countries [4]. To the knowledge of the researcher, there is limited research dealing with firm performance in the Middle Eastern countries, especially Jordan.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To mitigate this problem, classic works in agency theory such as [7], propose use of equity holdings of the firm instead of cash compensation to better align the interests between managers and shareholders. Despite the theoretical and practical importance, convincing empirical evidence has been elusive and consequently there is a lack of consensus on whether ownership structure matters for firm performance [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Ownership Structure on Firm Performance: Evidence from Jordan

Zraiq¹

2018

IJAFRM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study is an attempt to achieve the main objective by examining the association between ownership structure and firm performance of the Jordanian firms. This study used OLS regression to test the relationship between independent. variable and dependent variable as discussed in the section explaining the study method. The data comprised of 228 firms industrial and services. As this study Jordan attempts to bridge the gap. in the existing literature by investigating the association between ownership structure and firm performance in the emerging market of Jordan. The findings indicated a significantly positive relationship between ownership structure (family and foreign) and firm performance. Finally, this study provides recommendations for future research.

show abstract

Complex ownership structures, corporate governance and firm performance: The French context.

Cited by 64 publications

References 43 publications

Gobernanza Corporativa y Gobernanza Corporativa de TI utilizando Analytic Hierarchy Process en la creación de valor

Gobernanza Corporativa y Gobernanza Corporativa de TI utilizando Analytic Hierarchy Process en la creación de valor

Dynamic Panel Threshold Model-Based Analysis on Equity Restriction and Enterprise Performance in China

The Impact of Ownership Structure on Firm Performance: Evidence from Jordan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About