WOMEN IN PHYSICS: 6th IUPAP International Conference on Women in Physics 2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5110120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex refractive index of aerosol samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows the calculated light intensity ratio of the uncoalesced bisphere particle and equivalent spherical particle as a function of monomer diameter and refractive index. Typically, organics have a refractive index of 1.4-1.7 (Flores et al, 2014;He et al, 2018;Nakayama et al, 2012;Moise et al, 2015), and sea salt has a refractive index of 1.51 (Bi et al, 2018), which span the range of most atmospheric aerosol types (Mico et al, 2019;Shepherd et al, 2018). Some secondary organic aerosol particles from monoterpenes such as limonene, α-humulene, and α-pinene have an imaginary part of the refractive index, k < 0.05 (Flores et al, 2014).…”
Section: Light-scattering Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 shows the calculated light intensity ratio of the uncoalesced bisphere particle and equivalent spherical particle as a function of monomer diameter and refractive index. Typically, organics have a refractive index of 1.4-1.7 (Flores et al, 2014;He et al, 2018;Nakayama et al, 2012;Moise et al, 2015), and sea salt has a refractive index of 1.51 (Bi et al, 2018), which span the range of most atmospheric aerosol types (Mico et al, 2019;Shepherd et al, 2018). Some secondary organic aerosol particles from monoterpenes such as limonene, α-humulene, and α-pinene have an imaginary part of the refractive index, k < 0.05 (Flores et al, 2014).…”
Section: Light-scattering Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, values of m I retrieved within the lower aerosol layer are compatible with those found for the submicron and coarse fractions of black carbon particles (0.0075 in Panchenko et al., 2012), which can result from combustion of coal, oil and oil‐shale. Observed values of m I are also compatible with mineral dust particles (0.006 in Mico et al., 2019, and Wang et al., 2021, and 0.0055 in Willoughby et al., 2017) and with smoke particles (0.008 in McMeeking, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Unfortunately, independent measurements of m R and m I from in‐situ sensors are not available. However, an indirect estimation of these quantities can be inferred from the compositional information available from the chemical sensor, supported by literature papers (McMeeking, 2004; Mico et al., 2019; Panchenko et al., 2012; Sekiyama et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2021; Willoughby et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Decreasing N by 10% led to an almost 2-fold increase in k eff (Δ k eff = 0.011), whereas increasing N by the same fraction only slightly decreased k eff (Δ k eff = 0.002). Regardless of these sensitivities, the absolute value of k eff is almost an order of magnitude higher than that of nonabsorbing silica and much smaller (<5%) than k of absorbing materials such as graphene and soot at all λ considered. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Regardless of these sensitivities, the absolute value of k eff is almost an order of magnitude higher than that of nonabsorbing silica and much smaller (<5%) than k of absorbing materials such as graphene and soot at all λ considered. 43,64 Previous studies have retrieved k for Martian dusts from observational data sets. Ockert-Bell and Bell created a model using Hapke theory (derives reflectance of a mixture using singly and multiply scattered light) and size distribution data from the Viking lander's scattering angle measurements to estimate the single-scattering albedo (ω o , the ratio of scattering to extinction) and retrieved k = 0.011 at λ = 500 nm and assuming an effective particle diameter of 3.7 μm.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%