Complex social behaviour can select for variability in visual features: a case study inPolisteswasps

Abstract

The ability to recognize individuals is common in animals; however, we know little about why the phenotypic variability necessary for individual recognition has evolved in some animals but not others. One possibility is that natural selection favours variability in some social contexts but not in others. Polistes fuscatus wasps have variable facial and abdominal markings used for individual recognition within their complex societies. Here, I explore whether social behaviour can select for variability by examining the relationship between social behaviour and variability in visual features (marking variability) across social wasp taxa. Analysis using a concentrated changes test demonstrates that marking variability is significantly associated with nesting strategy. Species with flexible nest-founding strategies have highly variable markings, whereas species without flexible nest-founding strategies have low marking variability. These results suggest that: (i) individual recognition may be widespread in the social wasps, and (ii) natural selection may play a role in the origin and maintenance of the variable distinctive markings. Theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that species with flexible nesting strategies have reproductive transactions, a type of complex social behaviour predicted to require individual recognition. Therefore, the reproductive transactions of flexible species may select for highly variable individuals who are easy to identify as individuals. Further, selection for distinctiveness may provide an alternative explanation for the evolution of phenotypic diversity.

Evolving communicative complexity: insights from rodents and beyond

“…Increased individuality would be necessary to permit successful discrimination of all the individuals in the group. Since other attributes of sociality affect communicative complexity [39,82], these other attributes may also influence individuality.…”

The Coolidge effect, individual recognition and selection for distinctive cuticular signatures in a burying beetle

“…Researchers may frequently have assumed that the Coolidge effect requires more complex neural processing than invertebrates are capable of (Koene & Ter Maat 2007). However, some social insects have proven capable of individual recognition (Tibbetts 2002(Tibbetts , 2004D'Ettorre & Heinze 2005), and avoiding matings with one's previous mate may not necessarily require individual recognition. Female crickets Gryllus sigillatus use self-referencing (marking males with their individual specific chemical signature) to avoid re-mating with previous mates (Ivy et al 2005).…”

Yellow-bellied marmots: insights from an emergent view of sociality

“…For instance, and by analogy, if we look at social drivers of complex communication [91], we find that demographic role variation drives the evolution of repertoire size in sciurid rodents [92], but social group size drives the evolution of individuality [93]. Indeed, in other taxa, variation in the complexity of reproductive roles is associated with the individuality of facial markings [94], and colony size was associated with both bird and bat contact call individuality [95][96][97][98]. In primates, group size is associated with vocal repertoire size [99] and the ability to produce variable facial expressions [100].…”