Complex topology in the highway network of Hungary, 1990 and 1998

Buckwalter, Donald W.

doi:10.1016/s0966-6923(00)00048-x

Cited by 10 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Dobiveni podatci uneseni su u GIS 6 prostornu bazu podataka, a zatim su se, primjenom IDW 7 metode prostorne interpolacije, 8 izradile izokronijske karte. Vektorizirana prometna mreža Žumberka podijeljena je u odsječke da bi se dobio 243 skup veza i čvorova potrebnih za primjenu teorije grafa (Ilić, 1991(Ilić, , 1994Toskić i Ilić, 1997;Buckwalter, 2001), što je pak podloga za izračun odgovarajućih pokazatelja razvijenosti prometne mreže. Što se tiče prostorne sheme istraživanja, u radu je pod pojam Žumberak svrstano 81 naselje (u današnjim granicama) u sastavu Hrvatske, koje je tijekom povijesti bilo u sastavu Vojne krajine, pa se može govoriti o tzv.…”

Section: Metodologija I Prostorni Okvir Istraživanjaunclassified

Transport Accessibility As a Factor of Depopulation and Developmental Delay: Case Study Žumberak

Turk

Šimunić

Živić

2016

Drustvena istrazivanja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Metodologija I Prostorni Okvir Istraživanjaunclassified

Transport Accessibility As a Factor of Depopulation and Developmental Delay: Case Study Žumberak

Turk

Šimunić

Živić

2016

Drustvena istrazivanja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Graphs have been applied to many fields including engineering, electronics, social sciences, operations research (see, for example, Barnes and Harary 1983;Foulds 1992). Of most direct relevance here, graph theory has found significant application to the analysis of transport networks where there is an intuitive and obvious relationship between the links and nodes in a transport network and the edges (E) and vertices (V) in a graph G (for example, Kansky 1963;Morlok 1967;Bell and Iida 1997;Banks 1998;Buckwalter 2001;Barthélemy 2011). This conventional approach-sometimes referred to as a "primal" approach (Porta, Crucitti, and Latora 2006a)-has been used in several recent analyses of road networks (Buhl et al 2006;Cardillo et al 2006;Porta, Crucitti, and Latora 2006a;Lämmera, Gehlsena, and Helbinga 2006;Scellato et al 2006;Masucci, Stanilov, and Batty 2009;Strano et al 2012).…”

Section: Elements For Representationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Line structure representation for road network analysis

Marshall

2015

JTLU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Road hierarchy and network structure are intimately linked; however, there is not a consistent basis for representing and analyzing the particular hierarchical nature of road network structure. This paper introduces the line structureidentified mathematically as a kind of linearly ordered incidence structure-as a means of representing road network structure and demonstrates its relation to existing representations of road networks: the "primal" graph, the "dual" graph, and the route structure. In doing so, the paper shows how properties of continuity, junction type, and hierarchy relating to differential continuity and termination are necessarily absent from primal and dual graph representations but intrinsically present in line structure representations. A new property indicative of hierarchical status-"cardinality"-is introduced and illustrated with application to example networks. The paper concludes by highlighting newly explicit relationships between different kinds of road network structure representation.

show abstract

“…Thus, past research has employed topological methods based on graph theory for analysis at various scales of network structures (Buckwalter, 2001;Weber, 2012;Parthasarathi et al, 2012;Caschili and De Montis, 2013;Tsou and Cheng, 2013). Weber (2012) and Dupuy and Stransky (1996) applied network analysis to the evolution of highway systems, Parthasarathi et al (2012) analyzed roadway networks to identify their effect on individual travel behavior using topological indicators, Patarasuk (2013) employed network analysis to analyze changes in road network connectivity, and Caschili and De Montis (2013) used topological indicators to analyze commuter accessibility.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%