2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2009.14521
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity and Algorithms for Exploiting Quantal Opponents in Large Two-Player Games

Abstract: Solution concepts of traditional game theory assume entirely rational players; therefore, their ability to exploit subrational opponents is limited. One type of subrationality that describes human behavior well is the quantal response. While there exist algorithms for computing solutions against quantal opponents, they either do not scale or may provide strategies that are even worse than the entirely-rational Nash strategies. This paper aims to analyze and propose scalable algorithms for computing effective a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Network security games and others. Our work also relates to static Stackelberg security game models with Quantal Response adversaries [Černỳ et al, 2021, Haghtalab et al, 2016, Mai and Sinha, 2022, Milec et al, 2020, Yang et al, 2011, 2012. In dynamic models named as network security games [Jain et al, 2011], the set-up is different from our work as in this work the rational adversary aims to reach a target and stop, whereas in our work the boundedly rational adversary can attack multiple targets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network security games and others. Our work also relates to static Stackelberg security game models with Quantal Response adversaries [Černỳ et al, 2021, Haghtalab et al, 2016, Mai and Sinha, 2022, Milec et al, 2020, Yang et al, 2011, 2012. In dynamic models named as network security games [Jain et al, 2011], the set-up is different from our work as in this work the rational adversary aims to reach a target and stop, whereas in our work the boundedly rational adversary can attack multiple targets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%