2012
DOI: 10.1108/01445151211212299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity mapping of the product and assembly system

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present methods for assessing and mapping the complexity of products and their assembly. In cases of complexity of assembly it is important to consider and model at the product design stages when only data about individual parts/products and their assembly attributes are known. Assessing the complexity of assembly systems, based on the attributes of their components, is an essential step towards designing them for the least complexity.Design/methodology/approachThis paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schuh et al (2015) declared that the product complexity strongly affects the quality losses (81-88 percent agreed by the industry experts), and many researchers have described the assembly complexity as one of the most complex process in a manufacturing company in Germany. Samy and ElMaraghy (2012) utilized regression analysis to reveal the effect of part complexity on assembly equipment complexity, and they found a positive relation as expected. Falck et al (2017) compared the two methods, i.e.…”
Section: Manufacturing Complexitymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Schuh et al (2015) declared that the product complexity strongly affects the quality losses (81-88 percent agreed by the industry experts), and many researchers have described the assembly complexity as one of the most complex process in a manufacturing company in Germany. Samy and ElMaraghy (2012) utilized regression analysis to reveal the effect of part complexity on assembly equipment complexity, and they found a positive relation as expected. Falck et al (2017) compared the two methods, i.e.…”
Section: Manufacturing Complexitymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…AlGeddawy and ElMaraghy [36] proposed a hierarchical clustering (cladistics) technique to find an optimum granularity level of a modular product architecture in assembly process. Then, Samy et al [37] applied the technique to find an appropriate granularity level for balancing two sources of complexity in an assembly system: equipment and layout. Since then, AlGeddawy et al [38] integrated cladistics with both a matrix-based tool and the measure they introduced before [33] in order to balance modularity and complexity.…”
Section: B Design For Complexity Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hanafy [9] developed a novel model for concurrent design of product families and their corresponding assembly systems where a global product families and platforms formation mathematical model which fully integrates assembly task assignments, assembly sequence, and assembly cost was developed. Samy and ElMaraghy [10] introduced and implemented a method for defining and mapping products and their corresponding assembly systems in order to help system designers develop less complex assembly system. Bukchin et al [11] addressed the design of an assembly system facility involving multiple assembly lines of different layouts in which it is required to find the minimum area of the facility and to maximize the efficiency of the material handling system using a mixed integer programming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%