2016
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-60111-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity Thinking for Peacebuilding Practice and Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to analyze how the international system of states, multilateral organizations like the United Nations, and institutions like peacekeeping respond and adapt to change, I will employ a number of insights from complexity theory (de Coning, 2020b;Hunt, 2020). Complexity theory provides us with a theoretical framework for analyzing how complex systems, like societies, organizations, and institutions, function under stress, including how they react to turbulence and disruptions in their environment (Brusset et al, 2016;Kavalski, 2015). Complexity theory helps us understand how social systems respond to external stimuli, and how their resilience and adaptive capacity influence the likelihood that they will maintain functioning despite significant changes in their operating environment (Folke, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyze how the international system of states, multilateral organizations like the United Nations, and institutions like peacekeeping respond and adapt to change, I will employ a number of insights from complexity theory (de Coning, 2020b;Hunt, 2020). Complexity theory provides us with a theoretical framework for analyzing how complex systems, like societies, organizations, and institutions, function under stress, including how they react to turbulence and disruptions in their environment (Brusset et al, 2016;Kavalski, 2015). Complexity theory helps us understand how social systems respond to external stimuli, and how their resilience and adaptive capacity influence the likelihood that they will maintain functioning despite significant changes in their operating environment (Folke, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efforts of others are more in reaction to a developing awareness of the limitations of foundationalism, particularly those concerned with addressing applied problems where the need to produce useable results is paramount. Scholars and practitioners in areas such as development (Ramalingam, 2013;Boulton et al, 2015;Burns and Worsley, 2015), business (Richardson, 2008), peacebuilding (Brusset et al, 2016), education (Martin et al, 2019), and healthcare (Cristancho, 2016;Braithwaite et al, 2017Braithwaite et al, , 2018Greenhalgh and Papoutsi, 2018;Khan et al, 2018;Long et al, 2018) have embraced complexity thinking as a way forward due to its emphasis on concepts like non-linearity, emergent properties, uncertainty, and unpredictability, which seem to better describe the applied contexts they study. While those in this latter group utilize the systems language of complexity science, they often do not directly comment on issues of ontology or epistemology.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a description of agency in complex systems, seeBrusset et al (2017).2 Examples drawn fromMeadows (1999).3 For an application of systemic thinking to inter-ethnic disputes, seeSplinter and Wustehube (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%