“…The efforts of others are more in reaction to a developing awareness of the limitations of foundationalism, particularly those concerned with addressing applied problems where the need to produce useable results is paramount. Scholars and practitioners in areas such as development (Ramalingam, 2013;Boulton et al, 2015;Burns and Worsley, 2015), business (Richardson, 2008), peacebuilding (Brusset et al, 2016), education (Martin et al, 2019), and healthcare (Cristancho, 2016;Braithwaite et al, 2017Braithwaite et al, , 2018Greenhalgh and Papoutsi, 2018;Khan et al, 2018;Long et al, 2018) have embraced complexity thinking as a way forward due to its emphasis on concepts like non-linearity, emergent properties, uncertainty, and unpredictability, which seem to better describe the applied contexts they study. While those in this latter group utilize the systems language of complexity science, they often do not directly comment on issues of ontology or epistemology.…”