2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-010-0813-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compliant actuation of parallel-type variable stiffness actuator based on antagonistic actuation

Abstract: For a service robot requiring physical human-robot interaction, stable contact motion and collision safety are very important. To accomplish these functions, we propose a novel design for a parallel-type variable stiffness actuator (PVSA). The stiffness and position of a joint can be controlled simultaneously using the PVSA based on an antagonistic actuation inspired by the musculoskeletal system. The PVSA consists of a dual-cam follower mechanism, which acts like a human muscle, and a drive module with two mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher the preload of both antagonistic springs, the higher is the stiffness of the actuator (see Figure 2.1e). The Parallel Dual Action Unit (PDAU) is a compact realization of the antagonistic-controlled stiffness approach, including a force limitation mechanism (Nam et al, 2010).…”
Section: Antagonistic-controlled Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the preload of both antagonistic springs, the higher is the stiffness of the actuator (see Figure 2.1e). The Parallel Dual Action Unit (PDAU) is a compact realization of the antagonistic-controlled stiffness approach, including a force limitation mechanism (Nam et al, 2010).…”
Section: Antagonistic-controlled Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By replacing l S B from (3) with (l 0 + l p l ), the joint stiffness k j is given by k j = k s (l 0 + r r (θ r − θ c )) 2 (9) within the boundary condition for θ c and θ r given by r m in < l 0 + r r (θ r − θ c ) ≤ r com p for compliant motion r com p < l 0 + r r (θ r − θ c ) < r m ax for rigid motion (10) where r m in is the minimum moment arm related to the radius of the roller follower, r m ax is the maximum moment arm associated with the diameter of the ring gear, and r com p is the length to switch from the compliant motion to the rigid motion.…”
Section: A Principle Of Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the VSA-CubeBot [6] and the German Aerospace Center (DLR) hand-arm system [20] were equipped with small and lightweight VSAs. A variety of VSAs can be classified into two groups according to their principle of operation: the antagonistic actuation inspired by the musculoskeletal system [5]- [10], which is applied in the VSA [5], VSA-CUBE [6], VSA based on Harmonic Drives [7], quasi-antagonistic joint [8], floating spring joint [9], parallel-type variable stiffness actuator [10], and the variable stiffness actuation based on a main actuator and a variable stiffness mechanism (VSM) [11]- [18]. Several types of VSMs can be realized by using different power transmission mechanisms, such as the variable effective length mechanism and the cam-follower mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple mechanical design idea to achieve variable stiffness has been developed. From the arrangement of the actuators, Nam et al, 4 Petit et al, 5 and Tagliamonte et al 6 pointed out that there are two categories. The first is in serial configurations: a bigger motor to adjust the joint torque/position and another smaller motor to adjust the joint stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%