2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16934-2_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compliant Business Process Design Using Refinement Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work in [6] is interesting as it is complementary to our work. In [6], the authors have proposed a layered refinement process whose input is a compliant process template and its output is a fully refined compliant executable process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The work in [6] is interesting as it is complementary to our work. In [6], the authors have proposed a layered refinement process whose input is a compliant process template and its output is a fully refined compliant executable process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, we can also (6) test each subset of CR together with DK to find a global minimum unsatisfiable core in G related to CR.…”
Section: Inconsistency Analysis Of the Business Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 3), Ghose and Koliadis (2007) Schleicher, Anstett, Leymann, and Schumm (2010) Arbab, Kokash, and Meng (2009) (Foerster et al 2005(Foerster et al , 2007Küster et al 2007) use activity diagrams of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) (Object Management Group 2005). In addition, three approaches use the Business Process Execution Language (BPEL) (OASIS 2007) as their major application area for compliance checking Liu et al 2007;Schleicher et al 2010).…”
Section: Modeling Language Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3), Ghose and Koliadis (2007) Schleicher, Anstett, Leymann, and Schumm (2010) Arbab, Kokash, and Meng (2009) (Foerster et al 2005(Foerster et al , 2007Küster et al 2007) use activity diagrams of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) (Object Management Group 2005). In addition, three approaches use the Business Process Execution Language (BPEL) (OASIS 2007) as their major application area for compliance checking Liu et al 2007;Schleicher et al 2010). The approach of Arbab et al (2009) (Ly et al 2006) (№ 10) formulate a modeling language-spanning approach and explicitly classify it "[independent] from the underlying process meta model" (Ly et al 2006, p. 195 These rules require or prohibit a predefined order of process activities, either as direct successors or as successors over a path of activities (e.g., such a compliance rule could require checking credit-worthiness, before a credit is granted).…”
Section: Modeling Language Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%