2009
DOI: 10.2304/ciec.2009.10.3.218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complicating What it Means to ‘Struggle’: One Young Child's Experience with a Mandated Literacy Initiative

Abstract: In this article, the author explores the implementation of the K-3 Reading First initiative and its recommendation for scientifically based reading curricula. During a time of high-stakes testing and accountability, this policy has emphasized a skills-based approach to reading and placed importance on scripted teaching models. Using data from a qualitative study in a public school in New York City, the author draws on the experiences of one young child to see how the standardization of early literacy curriculu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Closer critical scrutiny of what is displaced by the concentrated future-focused emphasis on the child as learner reveals further key shifts in emphasis. For example, the words development and care-traditionally associated with the phrases early childhood care and education, and learning and development-are notably absent in the "Curriculum and learning" sections of international early years studies highlight related tensions between children having the freedom to pursue their own agendas at their own pace-as traditionally encouraged in play-and interest-based curricula-and busy teachers pressed to come up with learning goals for accountability purposes (Spencer, 2009;Wohlwend, 2007Wohlwend, , 2011.…”
Section: Dis/re/placing Development and Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closer critical scrutiny of what is displaced by the concentrated future-focused emphasis on the child as learner reveals further key shifts in emphasis. For example, the words development and care-traditionally associated with the phrases early childhood care and education, and learning and development-are notably absent in the "Curriculum and learning" sections of international early years studies highlight related tensions between children having the freedom to pursue their own agendas at their own pace-as traditionally encouraged in play-and interest-based curricula-and busy teachers pressed to come up with learning goals for accountability purposes (Spencer, 2009;Wohlwend, 2007Wohlwend, , 2011.…”
Section: Dis/re/placing Development and Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response, curricula for young children have become increasingly standardized, regimented, and paced, dimensions that stand in direct contrast to the playfulness and imagination of children's engagement with learning and their recursivity in exploring topics of interest. Children's multimodal and multilingual resources have not only become further excluded from classroom spaces (Spencer 2009), but they may also be coded as ''off-task'' or ''resistant'' to the academic expectations of school.…”
Section: (Re)forming Multilingual Children and Educators In New York mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narrative is the text type selected for this study because it is the common text type in schools (Haris ,2010). For example, the WAEC Chief Examiner's reports have frequently shown that students prefer answering questions on narrative text type but such attempts are largely unsatisfactory (WAEC 2008;2009;2010;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%