2010 17th Iranian Conference of Biomedical Engineering (ICBME) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icbme.2010.5704995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications due to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and role of cavitation bubbles impacts

Abstract: This paper presents a study of the role played by cavitations' bubbles in the creation of side effects or complications of cavitation bubbles' impact generated by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL). Apart from many useful applications of shock waves therapy, specifically, key role of cavitations' bubbles in the disintegration of urinary calculi, there is a large number of complications due to improper cavitations' bubbles intensity applied on the surfaces or organs. For the best result of ESWL with t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to ultrasound, the contact infection of the lithotripter probe is similar or even worse if the skin barrier is disrupted by the shock wave during ESWL. Because complications following ESWL, including bruising (up to 26%) and blood in the contact gel, are common [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], there is a possibility of an outflow of body fluids or bloody mixture on the gel and the probe. Given that the probe uses semi-liquid gel as an interface, the patient skin may be a potential source of nosocomial infection [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to ultrasound, the contact infection of the lithotripter probe is similar or even worse if the skin barrier is disrupted by the shock wave during ESWL. Because complications following ESWL, including bruising (up to 26%) and blood in the contact gel, are common [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], there is a possibility of an outflow of body fluids or bloody mixture on the gel and the probe. Given that the probe uses semi-liquid gel as an interface, the patient skin may be a potential source of nosocomial infection [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%