Aim: To compare the effects of the liquid-isolating maneuver and the lever-elevating maneuver in protecting cervical structures during microwave ablation for treating high-risk benign thyroid nodules. Methods: This prospectively study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Panzhihua Central Hospital. A total of 174 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a liquid-isolating maneuver group (LIM, n ¼ 87) or a lever-elevating maneuver group (LEM, n ¼ 87). Operation time, postoperative voice change, time to recovery of baseline voice, peri-thyroid hematoma, neck tension, and intraoperative vasovagal reaction were assessed. Results: Operation time was greater in the LIM group than in the LEM group (44.75 ± 13.14 vs. 32.87 ± 10.84 min; p ¼ .017).Voice changes were observed in 6 patients in the LIM group and 2 in the LEM group (6.9% vs. 2.3%, p ¼ .278). The time to recovery of baseline voice was significantly greater in the LIM group compared with the LEM group (36.15 ± 10.24 vs. 24.48 ± 11.53 days, p ¼ .014). The incidences of peri-thyroid hematoma and neck tension were higher in the LIM than in the LEM group (11.5% vs. 3.4%, 10.3% vs. 2.3%, p ¼ .044 and p ¼ .029). One patient (1.1%) in the LEM group and none of the patients in the LIM group experienced a vasovagal response (p ¼ 1.000). Conclusion: The lever-elevating method is feasible and effective for the microwave ablation of benign thyroid nodules, with better protection of neck structures than observed with the liquid-isolating method.