1985
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.157.1.4034977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Abstract: In 224 patients, renal stones were removed from the urinary tract using either direct extraction with a basket or forceps (59 patients), ultrasonic lithotripsy (164 patients), or infusion chemotherapy (one patient). Residual stone fragments were present more frequently in patients treated with ultrasonic lithotripsy (27%) than with direct extraction (5%). Other complications included hemorrhage (eight patients), catheter dislodgement (four patients), large amounts of urine extravasation (three patients), glyci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last 2 years there have also been reports about shock waves for the treatment of chil dren older than 3 years, which has proved to be an effec tive method [17,18]. There are however still certain problems in the treatment of large calculi over 2-3 cm, such as staghorn with shock waves: the necessity of per forming percutaneous nephrostomy for urinary drainage and several interventions with shock waves, ureter ob struction caused by multiple stone fragments (stone street), retained renal stone fragments, infection and bleeding, as well as uncertainty as to the duration of the treatment and the success rate [19,20]. Considering the many problems involved in the treatment of large calculi with shock waves, it may be advantageous to remove the calculi by operative procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last 2 years there have also been reports about shock waves for the treatment of chil dren older than 3 years, which has proved to be an effec tive method [17,18]. There are however still certain problems in the treatment of large calculi over 2-3 cm, such as staghorn with shock waves: the necessity of per forming percutaneous nephrostomy for urinary drainage and several interventions with shock waves, ureter ob struction caused by multiple stone fragments (stone street), retained renal stone fragments, infection and bleeding, as well as uncertainty as to the duration of the treatment and the success rate [19,20]. Considering the many problems involved in the treatment of large calculi with shock waves, it may be advantageous to remove the calculi by operative procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 With stone-free rates ranging from 75% to 95%, PCNL has proven to be an efficacious treatment for large calculi, staghorn, stones in kidneys with abnormal anatomy, and stones in more complicated patient groups. [2][3][4][5][6] Despite the advantages, incidence of complications is reported from 16% to 83%, with major complications representing 4.7% in tertiary referral centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 With stone-free rates ranging from 78% to 95%, PNL is an efficacious treatment for large calculi associated with a low but specific complication rate. 3 Complications can arise from the initial puncture(hemorrhage)andproximityofadjacentorgans(lungs, pleura, colon, spleen, and liver), while others are delayed (postoperative hemorrhage, infection, and fistulae). Major complications such as persistent urinary extravasation in 7.2%, [4][5][6][7] sepsis in 0.8% to 4.7%, [4][5][6][7] pleural injury in 2.3% to 3.1%, 1,4,7,8 colonic injury in 0.2% to 0.8%, 1,4,8,9 and death in 0.3% to 0.78% 4,6,7 are infrequently associated with PNL, whereas minor complications occur more frequently, including fever in 21% to 22.4% 4,5,10,11 and urinary tract infection in 11%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%