Component Alignment in Simultaneous Bilateral versus Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Choi

et al. 2020

JCM

The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate the relationship between lumbosacral flexibility and the effects of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on whole-body alignment; and (2) to determine the prerequisites of the adjacent joints for successful TKA. A total of 116 patients (156 cases) who had whole-body X-ray and flexion-extension lumbar radiograph available were enrolled. For the sagittal alignment evaluation, hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and C7 plumb line-sacrum distance (SVA) were evaluated on the whole-body radiographs. Lumbar flexibility (LF) was evaluated using the flexion-extension lumbar radiographs, and pelvic flexibility (PF) was evaluated using the pelvic incidence (PI). The disparities in the knee joint between postoperative passive motion and weight-bearing posture were assessed. LF was significantly correlated with ΔLL and ΔSVA (LL: p = 0.039, SVA: p = 0.040; Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC): −0.206 and 0.205, respectively). There were correlations between PF and ΔSS (p < 0.001, PCC: −0.362), and between the disparity and LF (p = 0.005, PCC = −0.275). Linear regression analysis demonstrated that LF was significantly associated with the presence of disparity (p = 0.005, β = −0.205). LF is an important factor for improved spinal and lower limb alignment after TKA. Additionally, reduced LF may result in knee joint disparity between passive extension and standing extension status. Therefore, surgeons should consider spinopelvic alignment, including lower limb alignment preoperatively, to be able to predict possible changes in whole-body alignment following TKA.

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spinal Flexibility Is an Important Factor for Improvement in Spinal and Knee Alignment after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation Using a Whole Body EOS System

Choi

et al. 2020

JCM

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

“…Theoretically, in bilateral procedure, the surgical site is exposed to lower temperatures for a total longer duration during sequential surgery, hence there is an increased risk of hypothermia. A study conducted by Qadir et al reported a higher incidence of sequential bilateral TKA compared to staged TKA in Pakistan [ 21 ]. However, more research is required to assess the effect of bilateral TKA on hypothermia.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing Total knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study from a developing country

Ukrani

Arif

Pidani

et al. 2021

Background Intraoperative hypothermia is associated with various risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), increasing the emotional and financial burden on patients. This study aimed to identify risk factors of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing TKA. Materials and methods All adult patients (⩾18 years) who underwent TKA from January 2016 to December 2017 at a tertiary-care hospital in Pakistan were included in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. Temperature < 36 °C was defined as hypothermia. Results The study included 286 patients (77.6% female) with a mean age of 61.4 ± 10.4 years. The overall proportion of intraoperative hypothermia was 26.6%. Of the total patients, 66.1% underwent bilateral TKA whereas 33.9% underwent unilateral TKA. 73.8% of the patients were ASA Level 2. Only 13.3% of patients had postoperative hypothermia. Conclusion Intraoperative hypothermia was significantly associated with age, bilateral procedure, ASA level and postoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing TKA. The surgeon and the operative team should be aware of the risk factors and the adverse outcomes associated with intraoperative hypothermia, especially in resource constrained settings to plan preventive strategies. Trial registration This study was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 3rd October 2020. The registration ID is NCT04575246.

“…Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-established surgical procedure for correcting deformed painful knees, especially those with varus and flexed deformities, and establishing neutral mechanical alignment [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. With an increasing aging population, it is common to encounter patients of knee arthritis with concomitant spinal problems because they are the most commonly affected areas due to degenerative changes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Total Knee Arthroplasty on Coronal and Sagittal Whole-Body Alignments: Serial Assessments Using Whole-Body EOS

Choi

et al. 2021

JCM

Background: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of correcting lower limb alignment by total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the spinopelvic alignment and to identify patients with difference in the knee joint between clinically measured passive motion and the actual standing posture. Methods: In this retrospective study, 101 patients who underwent TKA and whose serial whole-body EOS X-ray were available were included. The relationship of the knee and spinopelvic alignment was analyzed by evaluating the parameters of standing anterior-posterior and lateral whole-body EOS X-ray. The differences between postoperative passive motion and weight-bearing posture in the knee joint were assessed in both coronal and sagittal planes. Furthermore, the causes of such differences were analyzed. Results: Significant correlations between Δpelvic obliquity and coronal ΔHip-Knee-Ankle (HKA)Rt-Lt angle between the preoperative and 3-month and 1-year postoperative data (p < 0.001 and p < 0.005, respectively) and improved with coronal lower limb alignment close to neutral resulted in decreased pelvic obliquity (p < 0.001, ß = 0.085 and p = 0.005, ß = 0.065, respectively) were observed. The correlations between Δpelvic tilt (PT) and Δsacral slope (SS) and sagittal ΔHKARt-Lt angle were statistically significant (PT: p < 0.001 and p < 0.045; SS: p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). The improved sagittal alignment close to neutral resulted in decreased PT and increased SS. The difference between postoperative passive motion and the weight-bearing posture of the knee joint was correlated with lumbar lordosis and sagittal C7 plumb line-sacrum distance (p = 0.042 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: The correction of lower limb alignment with TKA affected pelvic parameters dominantly; however, there was little effect on the spinal alignment. Additionally, patients with anterior stooping or lumbar flat back demonstrated difference in extension between passive knee motion and standing. Therefore, rather than only focusing on changes in the knee alignment correction, knee surgeons should also evaluate the spinopelvic alignment before surgery to consider the prognosis of the standing and predict the possible changes in the whole-body alignment. This preoperative assessment may improve the prognosis of TKA.