2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Component analysis and heavy metal adsorption ability of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from sulfate reducing bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
35
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, SRB adhered to the surface of coal gangue, formed a biofilm, and secreted a large amount of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). The hydroxyl and carboxyl groups contained in the EPS on the surface of SRB combined with the metals in AMD to improve the repair effect [47][48][49]. From the removal percentage, the removal effect of Mn 2+ by Columns 1-4 was lower than that of Fe 2+ .…”
Section: Analysis Of Mn 2+ Removal Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the same time, SRB adhered to the surface of coal gangue, formed a biofilm, and secreted a large amount of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). The hydroxyl and carboxyl groups contained in the EPS on the surface of SRB combined with the metals in AMD to improve the repair effect [47][48][49]. From the removal percentage, the removal effect of Mn 2+ by Columns 1-4 was lower than that of Fe 2+ .…”
Section: Analysis Of Mn 2+ Removal Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average percentages of Mn 2+ removal were 50.04%, 55.90%, 73.81% and 28.36%, respectively. The main removal of Mn is that SRB reduces SO4 2− to S 2− , and S 2− reacts with Mn 2+ to form MnS precipitation [47]. At the same time, SRB adhered to the surface of coal gangue, formed a biofilm, and secreted a large amount of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS).…”
Section: Analysis Of Mn 2+ Removal Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers have been successful in removing heavy metals from wastewater. For example, Mehrasbi et al [18] in Iran used modified banana peel, Malakootian et al [19] in Iran used dried activated sludge, Malakootian et al [20] in Iran used nanofiltration, Mirzaienia et al [21] in Iran used a microbial desalination cell, Hamidian et al [22] in Iran used chitosan-clay nanocomposites, Yue et al [23] in China used extracellular polymer, Harraz et al [24] in Egypt used Rapid synthesis of titania-silica nanoparticles photocatalyst by a modified sol-gel method, Ray and Chen [25] in Singapore used semiconductor photocatalysis and Alatieh et al [26] in Saudi Arabia used advanced carbon nanotubes. Upadhyay and Srivastava [27] in India survey Application of ozone on remove of heavy metals from wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para isso, vários materiais adsorventes podem ser utilizados para eliminação ou redução da concentração de íons de metais pesados, destacando-se o carbono ativado, sílica gel, argilas minerais, resinas, zeólitas e substâncias poliméricas. Porém, muitos dos adsorventes utilizados atualmente apresentam elevados custos ou baixa seletividade, sendo importantes o desenvolvimento de novos materiais que apresentem uma maior eficiência na adsorção e com um menor custo de obtenção (SIYAL et al, 2018;BURAKOV et al, 2018;GORE et al, 2016;LI et al, 2016;POLOWCZYK et al, 2016;MALEKIA et al, 2015;XIAO et al, 2015;YUE et al, 2015;).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified