1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1981.tb01552.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Components of regrowth in grazed and cut Lolium perenne swards

Abstract: Growth measurements were made on Lolium /jerenoe-dominant vegetative swards during 4-week regrowth periods following grazing or cutting.In the grazing study, the ryegrass (Lolium perenne) swards were grazed for 12-d periods with stock numbers set according to initial herbage allowances per animal of 16, 32 and 64 kg organic matter per sheep. One area was grazed in summer and another area in the autumn.In the cutting experiment four ryegrass swards growing in boxes were prepared by cutting to either 2 or 6 cm a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
58
1
23

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
58
1
23
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no effect of treatment on sward DM production at any point during the experiment, which is perhaps attributable to the similarity in sward morphology, both above and below the grazing horizon, across treatments and the lack of difference in post-grazing HM >2.7 cm following P1. Furthermore, as swards were grazed at the target pre-grazing HM, there were similar proportions of leaf in both swards and it ensured that sufficient leaf remained post-grazing to intercept solar radiation, which is required for respiration and tissue growth (Grant et al, 1981). MacDonald et al (2008) found an increase in pasture quality as swards were defoliated to a lower PGSH, this is in contrast with the present experiment, which found no difference in sward quality.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…However, there was no effect of treatment on sward DM production at any point during the experiment, which is perhaps attributable to the similarity in sward morphology, both above and below the grazing horizon, across treatments and the lack of difference in post-grazing HM >2.7 cm following P1. Furthermore, as swards were grazed at the target pre-grazing HM, there were similar proportions of leaf in both swards and it ensured that sufficient leaf remained post-grazing to intercept solar radiation, which is required for respiration and tissue growth (Grant et al, 1981). MacDonald et al (2008) found an increase in pasture quality as swards were defoliated to a lower PGSH, this is in contrast with the present experiment, which found no difference in sward quality.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…However, leaf production on an area basis is likely to be similar under both managements as leaf and tiller size and leaf extension rates were inversely related to tiller density. Similar effects have been reported by Grant et al (1981). Because such compensatory mechanisms operate in grazed swards, greater potential for improving pasture production in low fertility hill country would appear to lie in raising soil nutrient status than in changing grazing management practices, as shown by Lambert et al (1983).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The FLL is a plastic characteristic of the plant that responds to grazing intensity imposed on pastures and it is considered a morphological plant strategy to be less affected in grazing (LEMAIRE; CHAPMAN, 1996). According to Grant et al (1981), the greater FLL values are associated with greater defoliation heights owing to the large sheath length, which is directly related to the SER. The leaf sheath size is greater at pastures kept higher than in pastures kept lower, which increases the distance that the leaf blade will travel from the apical meristem to the emergence, resulting in increased length of the expanded leaf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%