DOI: 10.47328/ufvbbt.2022.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comportamento intraempreendedor e abordagens de inovação no setor público: um estudo a partir de laboratórios de inovação em governos na América do Sul

Abstract: Este estudo tem o objetivo de analisar se os laboratórios de inovação em governo têm promovido o comportamento intraempreendedor de servidores públicos e se contribuem para superar as barreiras deste comportamento. Para tal, utilizou-se de uma abordagem qualitativa e quantitativa, de natureza descritiva e exploratória, por meio de um estudo de casos múltiplos exploratório e holístico. Os dados foram coletados a partir de fontes documentais e bibliográficas, entrevistas exploratórias e a aplicação de dois quest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As organizational barriers, the shortcomings related to people management policies, a low incentive for professional training, and the absence of periodic training programs in innovation and entrepreneurship in the public sector beyond agile method tools may limit the dissemination and implementation of innovative services (Emmendoerfer, 2019b). Another aspect consists of the risk of precarization of labor relations or of the efficiency of innovative public services associated with the timing and speed of answering external demands; these may improve the response time but involve questioning the necessary conditions to keep this pace and innovative conditions for providing public services, given the fragility/limitation of remuneration policies and career progression in the public sector (Silva-Junior, 2022).…”
Section: Open Goverment Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As organizational barriers, the shortcomings related to people management policies, a low incentive for professional training, and the absence of periodic training programs in innovation and entrepreneurship in the public sector beyond agile method tools may limit the dissemination and implementation of innovative services (Emmendoerfer, 2019b). Another aspect consists of the risk of precarization of labor relations or of the efficiency of innovative public services associated with the timing and speed of answering external demands; these may improve the response time but involve questioning the necessary conditions to keep this pace and innovative conditions for providing public services, given the fragility/limitation of remuneration policies and career progression in the public sector (Silva-Junior, 2022).…”
Section: Open Goverment Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%